Newer
Older
//===- Reassociate.cpp - Reassociate binary expressions -------------------===//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file was developed by the LLVM research group and is distributed under
// the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This pass reassociates commutative expressions in an order that is designed
// to promote better constant propagation, GCSE, LICM, PRE...
//
// For example: 4 + (x + 5) -> x + (4 + 5)
//
// In the implementation of this algorithm, constants are assigned rank = 0,
// function arguments are rank = 1, and other values are assigned ranks
// corresponding to the reverse post order traversal of current function
// (starting at 2), which effectively gives values in deep loops higher rank
// than values not in loops.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#define DEBUG_TYPE "reassociate"
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
#include "llvm/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/Function.h"
#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/Type.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/PostOrderIterator.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
Statistic<> NumLinear ("reassociate","Number of insts linearized");
Statistic<> NumChanged("reassociate","Number of insts reassociated");
Statistic<> NumSwapped("reassociate","Number of insts with operands swapped");
class Reassociate : public FunctionPass {
std::map<Value*, unsigned> ValueRankMap;
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
unsigned getRank(Value *V);
bool ReassociateExpr(BinaryOperator *I);
bool ReassociateBB(BasicBlock *BB);
};
// Public interface to the Reassociate pass
FunctionPass *llvm::createReassociatePass() { return new Reassociate(); }
Chris Lattner
committed
unsigned i = 2;
// Assign distinct ranks to function arguments
for (Function::arg_iterator I = F.arg_begin(), E = F.arg_end(); I != E; ++I)
ValueRankMap[I] = ++i;
for (ReversePostOrderTraversal<Function*>::rpo_iterator I = RPOT.begin(),
E = RPOT.end(); I != E; ++I)
Chris Lattner
committed
RankMap[*I] = ++i << 16;
}
unsigned Reassociate::getRank(Value *V) {
if (isa<Argument>(V)) return ValueRankMap[V]; // Function argument...
Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V);
if (I == 0) return 0; // Otherwise it's a global or constant, rank 0.
unsigned &CachedRank = ValueRankMap[I];
if (CachedRank) return CachedRank; // Rank already known?
// If this is an expression, return the 1+MAX(rank(LHS), rank(RHS)) so that
// we can reassociate expressions for code motion! Since we do not recurse
// for PHI nodes, we cannot have infinite recursion here, because there
// cannot be loops in the value graph that do not go through PHI nodes.
//
if (I->getOpcode() == Instruction::PHI ||
I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Alloca ||
I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Malloc || isa<TerminatorInst>(I) ||
I->mayWriteToMemory()) // Cannot move inst if it writes to memory!
return RankMap[I->getParent()];
// If not, compute it!
unsigned Rank = 0, MaxRank = RankMap[I->getParent()];
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->getNumOperands();
i != e && Rank != MaxRank; ++i)
Rank = std::max(Rank, getRank(I->getOperand(i)));
DEBUG(std::cerr << "Calculated Rank[" << V->getName() << "] = "
<< Rank+1 << "\n");
return CachedRank = Rank+1;
}
bool Reassociate::ReassociateExpr(BinaryOperator *I) {
Value *LHS = I->getOperand(0);
Value *RHS = I->getOperand(1);
unsigned LHSRank = getRank(LHS);
unsigned RHSRank = getRank(RHS);
bool Changed = false;
// Make sure the LHS of the operand always has the greater rank...
if (LHSRank < RHSRank) {
bool Success = !I->swapOperands();
assert(Success && "swapOperands failed");
std::swap(LHS, RHS);
std::swap(LHSRank, RHSRank);
Changed = true;
++NumSwapped;
// If the LHS is the same operator as the current one is, and if we are the
// only expression using it...
//
if (BinaryOperator *LHSI = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHS))
if (LHSI->getOpcode() == I->getOpcode() && LHSI->hasOneUse()) {
// If the rank of our current RHS is less than the rank of the LHS's LHS,
// then we reassociate the two instructions...
unsigned TakeOp = 0;
if (BinaryOperator *IOp = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(LHSI->getOperand(0)))
if (IOp->getOpcode() == LHSI->getOpcode())
TakeOp = 1; // Hoist out non-tree portion
if (RHSRank < getRank(LHSI->getOperand(TakeOp))) {
// Convert ((a + 12) + 10) into (a + (12 + 10))
I->setOperand(0, LHSI->getOperand(TakeOp));
LHSI->setOperand(TakeOp, RHS);
I->setOperand(1, LHSI);
// Move the LHS expression forward, to ensure that it is dominated by
// its operands.
LHSI->getParent()->getInstList().remove(LHSI);
I->getParent()->getInstList().insert(I, LHSI);
++NumChanged;
DEBUG(std::cerr << "Reassociated: " << *I/* << " Result BB: "
// Since we modified the RHS instruction, make sure that we recheck it.
Chris Lattner
committed
ReassociateExpr(I);
return true;
}
}
return Changed;
}
// NegateValue - Insert instructions before the instruction pointed to by BI,
// that computes the negative version of the value specified. The negative
// version of the value is returned, and BI is left pointing at the instruction
// that should be processed next by the reassociation pass.
//
static Value *NegateValue(Value *V, Instruction *BI) {
// We are trying to expose opportunity for reassociation. One of the things
// that we want to do to achieve this is to push a negation as deep into an
// expression chain as possible, to expose the add instructions. In practice,
// this means that we turn this:
// X = -(A+12+C+D) into X = -A + -12 + -C + -D = -12 + -A + -C + -D
// so that later, a: Y = 12+X could get reassociated with the -12 to eliminate
// the constants. We assume that instcombine will clean up the mess later if
// we introduce tons of unnecessary negation instructions...
//
if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V))
if (I->getOpcode() == Instruction::Add && I->hasOneUse()) {
Value *RHS = NegateValue(I->getOperand(1), BI);
Value *LHS = NegateValue(I->getOperand(0), BI);
// We must actually insert a new add instruction here, because the neg
// instructions do not dominate the old add instruction in general. By
// adding it now, we are assured that the neg instructions we just
// inserted dominate the instruction we are about to insert after them.
//
Chris Lattner
committed
return BinaryOperator::create(Instruction::Add, LHS, RHS,
I->getName()+".neg", BI);
}
// Insert a 'neg' instruction that subtracts the value from zero to get the
// negation.
//
return BinaryOperator::createNeg(V, V->getName() + ".neg", BI);
/// isReassociableOp - Return true if V is an instruction of the specified
/// opcode and if it only has one use.
static bool isReassociableOp(Value *V, unsigned Opcode) {
return V->hasOneUse() && isa<Instruction>(V) &&
cast<Instruction>(V)->getOpcode() == Opcode;
}
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
/// BreakUpSubtract - If we have (X-Y), and if either X is an add, or if this is
/// only used by an add, transform this into (X+(0-Y)) to promote better
/// reassociation.
static Instruction *BreakUpSubtract(Instruction *Sub) {
// Reject cases where it is pointless to do this.
if (Sub->getType()->isFloatingPoint())
return 0; // Floating point adds are not associative.
// Don't bother to break this up unless either the LHS is an associable add or
// if this is only used by one.
if (!isReassociableOp(Sub->getOperand(0), Instruction::Add) &&
!isReassociableOp(Sub->getOperand(1), Instruction::Add) &&
!(Sub->hasOneUse() &&isReassociableOp(Sub->use_back(), Instruction::Add)))
return 0;
// Convert a subtract into an add and a neg instruction... so that sub
// instructions can be commuted with other add instructions...
//
// Calculate the negative value of Operand 1 of the sub instruction...
// and set it as the RHS of the add instruction we just made...
//
std::string Name = Sub->getName();
Sub->setName("");
Value *NegVal = NegateValue(Sub->getOperand(1), Sub);
Instruction *New =
BinaryOperator::createAdd(Sub->getOperand(0), NegVal, Name, Sub);
// Everyone now refers to the add instruction.
Sub->replaceAllUsesWith(New);
Sub->eraseFromParent();
DEBUG(std::cerr << "Negated: " << *New);
return New;
}
/// ConvertShiftToMul - If this is a shift of a reassociable multiply or is used
/// by one, change this into a multiply by a constant to assist with further
/// reassociation.
static Instruction *ConvertShiftToMul(Instruction *Shl) {
if (!isReassociableOp(Shl->getOperand(0), Instruction::Mul) &&
!(Shl->hasOneUse() && isReassociableOp(Shl->use_back(),Instruction::Mul)))
return 0;
Constant *MulCst = ConstantInt::get(Shl->getType(), 1);
MulCst = ConstantExpr::getShl(MulCst, cast<Constant>(Shl->getOperand(1)));
std::string Name = Shl->getName(); Shl->setName("");
Instruction *Mul = BinaryOperator::createMul(Shl->getOperand(0), MulCst,
Name, Shl);
Shl->replaceAllUsesWith(Mul);
Shl->eraseFromParent();
return Mul;
}
/// ReassociateBB - Inspect all of the instructions in this basic block,
/// reassociating them as we go.
bool Reassociate::ReassociateBB(BasicBlock *BB) {
bool Changed = false;
for (BasicBlock::iterator BI = BB->begin(); BI != BB->end(); ++BI) {
// If this is a subtract instruction which is not already in negate form,
// see if we can convert it to X+-Y.
if (BI->getOpcode() == Instruction::Sub && !BinaryOperator::isNeg(BI))
if (Instruction *NI = BreakUpSubtract(BI)) {
Changed = true;
BI = NI;
}
if (BI->getOpcode() == Instruction::Shl &&
isa<ConstantInt>(BI->getOperand(1)))
if (Instruction *NI = ConvertShiftToMul(BI)) {
Changed = true;
BI = NI;
}
// If this instruction is a commutative binary operator, and the ranks of
// the two operands are sorted incorrectly, fix it now.
//
if (BI->isAssociative()) {
DEBUG(std::cerr << "Reassociating: " << *BI);
if (!I->use_empty()) {
// Make sure that we don't have a tree-shaped computation. If we do,
// linearize it. Convert (A+B)+(C+D) into ((A+B)+C)+D
//
Instruction *LHSI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(I->getOperand(0));
Instruction *RHSI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(I->getOperand(1));
if (LHSI && (int)LHSI->getOpcode() == I->getOpcode() &&
RHSI && (int)RHSI->getOpcode() == I->getOpcode() &&
// Insert a new temporary instruction... (A+B)+C
BinaryOperator *Tmp = BinaryOperator::create(I->getOpcode(), LHSI,
RHSI->getOperand(0),
Chris Lattner
committed
RHSI->getName()+".ra",
BI);
BI = Tmp;
I->setOperand(0, Tmp);
I->setOperand(1, RHSI->getOperand(1));
// Process the temporary instruction for reassociation now.
I = Tmp;
++NumLinear;
Changed = true;
DEBUG(std::cerr << "Linearized: " << *I/* << " Result BB: " << BB*/);
}
// Make sure that this expression is correctly reassociated with respect
// to it's used values...
//
Changed |= ReassociateExpr(I);
}
}
}
return Changed;
}
// Recalculate the rank map for F
BuildRankMap(F);
bool Changed = false;
for (Function::iterator FI = F.begin(), FE = F.end(); FI != FE; ++FI)
Changed |= ReassociateBB(FI);
// We are done with the rank map...
RankMap.clear();
ValueRankMap.clear();