Skip to content
Commit 2b78ef06 authored by Jez Ng's avatar Jez Ng
Browse files

[lld-macho][nfc] Eliminate InputSection::Shared

Earlier in LLD's evolution, I tried to create the illusion that
subsections were indistinguishable from "top-level" sections. Thus, even
though the subsections shared many common field values, I hid those
common values away in a private Shared struct (see D105305). More
recently, however, @gkm added a public `Section` struct in D113241 that
served as an explicit way to store values that are common to an entire
set of subsections (aka InputSections). Now that we have another "common
value" struct, `Shared` has been rendered redundant. All its fields can
be moved into `Section` instead, and the pointer to `Shared` can be replaced
with a pointer to `Section`.

This `Section` pointer also has the advantage of letting us inspect other
subsections easily, simplifying the implementation of {D118798}.

P.S. I do think that having both `Section` and `InputSection` makes for
a slightly confusing naming scheme. I considered renaming `InputSection`
to `Subsection`, but that would break the symmetry with `OutputSection`.
It would also make us deviate from LLD-ELF's naming scheme.

This change is perf-neutral on my 3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W machine:

             base           diff           difference (95% CI)
  sys_time   1.258 ± 0.031  1.248 ± 0.023  [  -1.6% ..   +0.1%]
  user_time  3.659 ± 0.047  3.658 ± 0.041  [  -0.5% ..   +0.4%]
  wall_time  4.640 ± 0.085  4.625 ± 0.063  [  -1.0% ..   +0.3%]
  samples    49             61

There's also no stat sig change in RSS (as measured by `time -l`):

           base                         diff                           difference (95% CI)
  time     998038627.097 ± 13567305.958 1003327715.556 ± 15210451.236  [  -0.2% ..   +1.2%]
  samples  31                           36

Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118797
parent dbf47d22
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment