Fix hole in our enforcement of rule requiring 'typename' prior to a dependent

name. If the dependent name happened to end in a template-id (X<T>::Y<U>), we
would fail to notice that the 'typename' keyword is missing when resolving it
to a type.

It turns out that GCC has a similar bug. If this shows up in much real code, we
can easily downgrade this to an ExtWarn.

llvm-svn: 293815