[SDAG] add check to sext-of-setcc fold to bypass changing a legal op
I accidentaly pushed a draft of D103280 that was discussed during the review, but it was not supposed to be the final version. Rather than revert and recommit, I'm updating the existing code. This way we have a record of the codegen diff that would result if we decide to remove this predicate in the future.
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment