[GlobalOpt] Improve common case efficiency of static global initializer evaluation

For very, very large global initializers which can be statically evaluated, the
code would create vectors of temporary Constants, modifying them in place,
before committing the resulting Constant aggregate to the global's initializer
value. This had effectively O(n^2) complexity in the size of the global
initializer and would cause memory and non-termination issues compiling some
workloads.

This change performs the static initializer evaluation and creation in batches,
once for each global in the evaluated IR memory. The existing code is maintained
as a last resort when the initializers are more complex than simple values in a
large aggregate. This should theoretically by NFC, no test as the example case
is massive. The existing test cases pass with this, as well as the llvm test
suite.

To give an example, consider the following C++ code adapted from the clang
regression tests:
struct S {
 int n = 10;
 int m = 2 * n;
 S(int a) : n(a) {}
};

template<typename T>
struct U {
 T *r = &q;
 T q = 42;
 U *p = this;
};

U<S> e;

The global static constructor for 'e' will need to initialize 'r' and 'p' of
the outer struct, while also initializing the inner 'q' structs 'n' and 'm'
members. This batch algorithm will simply use general CommitValueTo() method
to handle the complex nested S struct initialization of 'q', before
processing the outermost members in a single batch. Using CommitValueTo() to
handle member in the outer struct is inefficient when the struct/array is
very large as we end up creating and destroy constant arrays for each
initialization.
For the above case, we expect the following IR to be generated:

%struct.U = type { %struct.S*, %struct.S, %struct.U* }
%struct.S = type { i32, i32 }
@e = global %struct.U { %struct.S* gep inbounds (%struct.U, %struct.U* @e,
                                                 i64 0, i32 1),
                        %struct.S { i32 42, i32 84 }, %struct.U* @e }
The %struct.S { i32 42, i32 84 } inner initializer is treated as a complex
constant expression, while the other two elements of @e are "simple".

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42612

llvm-svn: 323933