Skip to content
Commit 9adedd14 authored by Nikita Popov's avatar Nikita Popov
Browse files

[InstCombine] Relax preconditions for ashr+and+icmp fold (PR44754)

Fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44754. We already have
a fold that converts icmp (and (ashr X, C3), C2), C1 into
icmp (and C2'), C1', but it imposed overly strict requirements on the
transform.

Relax this by checking that both C2 and C1 don't shift out bits
(in a signed sense) when forming the new constants.

Alive proofs (https://rise4fun.com/Alive/PTz0):

    Name: ashr_legal
    Pre: ((C2 << C3) >> C3) == C2 && ((C1 << C3) >> C3) == C1
    %a = ashr i16 %x, C3
    %b = and i16 %a, C2
    %c = icmp i16 %b, C1
    =>
    %d = and i16 %x, C2 << C3
    %c = icmp i16 %d, C1 << C3

    Name: ashr_shiftout_eq
    Pre: ((C2 << C3) >> C3) == C2 && ((C1 << C3) >> C3) != C1
    %a = ashr i16 %x, C3
    %b = and i16 %a, C2
    %c = icmp eq i16 %b, C1
    =>
    %c = false

Note that >> corresponds to ashr here. The case of an equality
comparison has some special handling in this transform, because
it will form to a true/false result if the condition on the comparison
constant it violated.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74294
parent 9bc6bc2d
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment