[SDAG] fold fsub -0.0, undef to undef rather than NaN

A question about this behavior came up on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-February/139003.html
...and as part of backend improvements in D73978.

We decided not to implement a more general change that would have
folded any FP binop with nearly arbitrary constant + undef operand
to undef because that is not theoretically correct (even if it is
practically correct).

This is the SDAG-equivalent to the IR change in D74713.