Second part of pr16069

The problem this time seems to be a thinko. We were assuming that in the CFG

A
| \
|  B
| /
C

speculating the basic block B would cause only the phi value for the B->C edge
to be speculated. That is not true, the phi's are semantically in the edges, so
if the A->B->C path is taken, any code needed for A->C is not executed and we
have to consider it too when deciding to speculate B.

llvm-svn: 183226