Hoist back-copies to the least busy dominator.
When a back-copy is hoisted to the nearest common dominator, keep looking up the dominator tree for a less loopy dominator, and place the back-copy there instead. Don't do this when a single existing back-copy dominates all the others. Assume the client knows what he is doing, and keep the dominating back-copy. This prevents us from hoisting back-copies into loops in most cases. If a value is defined in a loop with multiple exits, we may still hoist back-copies into that loop. That is the speed/size tradeoff. llvm-svn: 139698
Loading
Please sign in to comment