[LSR] Fix Shadow IV in case of integer overflow

When LSR processes code like

  int accumulator = 0;
  for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
    accummulator += i;
    use((double) accummulator);
  }

It may decide to replace integer `accumulator` with a double Shadow IV to get rid
of casts.  The problem with that is that the `accumulator`'s value may overflow.
Starting from this moment, the behavior of integer and double accumulators
will differ.

This patch strenghtens up the conditions of Shadow IV mechanism applicability.
We only allow it for IVs that are proved to be `AddRec`s with `nsw`/`nuw` flag.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37209

llvm-svn: 311986