[IR] Set name when inserting 'llvm::Value*'
Summary: I noticed a small regression in a toy project of mine after applying D73835, in which instruction names weren't being set properly. In the example test case included with this patch, `llvm::IRBuilderBase::CreateAdd` returns an `llvm::Value *` that is then passed as an argument to `llvm::IRBuilderBase::Insert`. The overloaded function that is selected for that call then ignores the `Name` parameter that is given. This patch addresses that issue. Reviewers: nikic, Meinersbur, nhaehnle, fhahn, thakis, teemperor Reviewed By: nikic, fhahn Subscribers: llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74754
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment