[X86] Don't lie about legality to TLI's demanded bits.
Like r309323, X86 had a typo where it passed the wrong flags to TLO. Found by inspection; I haven't been able to tickle this into having observable behavior. I don't think it does, given that X86 doesn't have custom demanded bits logic, and the generic logic doesn't have a lot of exposure to illegal constructs. llvm-svn: 309325
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment