[LoopInterchange] Replace tightly-nesting-ness check with the one from `LoopNest`
The check `tightlyNested()` in `LoopInterchange` is similar to the one in `LoopNest`. In fact, the former misses some cases where loop-interchange is not feasible and results in incorrect behaviour. Replacing it with the much robust version provided by `LoopNest` reduces code duplications and fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48113. `LoopInterchange` has a weaker definition of tightly or perfectly nesting-ness than the one implemented in `LoopNest::arePerfectlyNested()`. Therefore, `tightlyNested()` is instead implemented with `LoopNest::checkLoopsStructure` and additional checks for unsafe instructions. Reviewed By: Whitney Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97290
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment