[scudo][standalone] Remove unused atomic_compare_exchange_weak
`atomic_compare_exchange_weak` is unused in Scudo, and its associated test is actually wrong since the weak variant is allowed to fail spuriously (thanks Roland). This lead to flakes such as: ``` [ RUN ] ScudoAtomicTest.AtomicCompareExchangeTest ../../zircon/third_party/scudo/src/tests/atomic_test.cpp:98: Failure: Expected atomic_compare_exchange_weak(reinterpret_cast<T *>(&V), &OldVal, NewVal, memory_order_relaxed) is true. Expected: true Which is: 01 Actual : atomic_compare_exchange_weak(reinterpret_cast<T *>(&V), &OldVal, NewVal, memory_order_relaxed) Which is: 00 ../../zircon/third_party/scudo/src/tests/atomic_test.cpp:100: Failure: Expected atomic_compare_exchange_weak( reinterpret_cast<T *>(&V), &OldVal, NewVal, memory_order_relaxed) is false. Expected: false Which is: 00 Actual : atomic_compare_exchange_weak( reinterpret_cast<T *>(&V), &OldVal, NewVal, memory_order_relaxed) Which is: 01 ../../zircon/third_party/scudo/src/tests/atomic_test.cpp:101: Failure: Expected OldVal == NewVal. Expected: NewVal Which is: 24 Actual : OldVal Which is: 42 [ FAILED ] ScudoAtomicTest.AtomicCompareExchangeTest (0 ms) [----------] 2 tests from ScudoAtomicTest (1 ms total) ``` So I am removing this, if someone ever needs the weak variant, feel free to add it back with a test that is not as terrible. This test was initially ported from sanitizer_common, but their weak version calls the strong version, so it works for them. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88443
Loading
Please sign in to comment