Revert r301822 (and dependent r301825), which tried to improve the

handling of constexprs with unknown bounds.

This triggers a corner case of the language where it's not yet clear
whether this should be an error:

  struct A {
    static void *const a[];
    static void *const b[];
  };
  constexpr void *A::a[] = {&b[0]};
  constexpr void *A::b[] = {&a[0]};

When discovering the initializer for A::a, the bounds of A::b aren't known yet.
It is unclear whether warning about errors should be deferred until the end of
the translation unit, possibly resolving errors that can be resolved. In
practice, the compiler can know the bounds of all arrays in this example.

Credits for reproducers and explanation go to Richard Smith. Richard, please
add more info in case my explanation is wrong.

llvm-svn: 301963