A function with discardable linkage cannot be discarded if its a member
of a COMDAT group without considering all the other COMDAT members as
well.  This sort of thing is already handled by GlobalOpt/GlobalDCE.

This fixes PR21206.

llvm-svn: 219335

This adds an immutable pass, AssumptionTracker, which keeps a cache of
@llvm.assume call instructions within a module. It uses callback value handles
to keep stale functions and intrinsics out of the map, and it relies on any
code that creates new @llvm.assume calls to notify it of the new instructions.
The benefit is that code needing to find @llvm.assume intrinsics can do so
directly, without scanning the function, thus allowing the cost of @llvm.assume
handling to be negligible when none are present.

The current design is intended to be lightweight. We don't keep track of
anything until we need a list of assumptions in some function. The first time
this happens, we scan the function. After that, we add/remove @llvm.assume
calls from the cache in response to registration calls and ValueHandle
callbacks.

There are no new direct test cases for this pass, but because it calls it
validation function upon module finalization, we'll pick up detectable
inconsistencies from the other tests that touch @llvm.assume calls.

This pass will be used by follow-up commits that make use of @llvm.assume.

llvm-svn: 217334

This feeds AA through the IFI structure into the inliner so that
AddAliasScopeMetadata can use AA->getModRefBehavior to figure out which
functions only access their arguments (instead of just hard-coding some
knowledge of memory intrinsics). Most of the information is only available from
BasicAA; this is important for preserving alias scoping information for
target-specific intrinsics when doing the noalias parameter attribute to
metadata conversion.

llvm-svn: 216866

llvm-svn: 214312

Summary:
This adds two new diagnostics: -pass-remarks-missed and
-pass-remarks-analysis. They take the same values as -pass-remarks but
are intended to be triggered in different contexts.

-pass-remarks-missed is used by LLVMContext::emitOptimizationRemarkMissed,
which passes call when they tried to apply a transformation but
couldn't.

-pass-remarks-analysis is used by LLVMContext::emitOptimizationRemarkAnalysis,
which passes call when they want to inform the user about analysis
results.

The patch also:

1- Adds support in the inliner for the two new remarks and a
   test case.

2- Moves emitOptimizationRemark* functions to the llvm namespace.

3- Adds an LLVMContext argument instead of making them member functions
   of LLVMContext.

Reviewers: qcolombet

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3682

llvm-svn: 209442

override the default cold threshold.

When we use command line argument to set the inline threshold, the default
cold threshold will not be used. This is in line with how we use
OptSizeThreshold. When we want a higher threshold for all functions, we
do not have to set both inline threshold and cold threshold.

llvm-svn: 207245

llvm-svn: 207196

definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/...
edition.

This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes
that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their
name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE.

Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those
headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them
well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation
for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the
modules implementation.

llvm-svn: 206844

Inliner::OptimizationRemark: Fix crash in clang/test/Frontend/optimization-remark.c on some hosts, including --vg.

DebugLoc in Callsite would not live after Inliner. It should be copied before Inliner.

llvm-svn: 206459

Summary:
This patch adds backend support for -Rpass=, which indicates the name
of the optimization pass that should emit remarks stating when it
made a transformation to the code.

Pass names are taken from their DEBUG_NAME definitions.

When emitting an optimization report diagnostic, the lack of debug
information causes the diagnostic to use "<unknown>:0:0" as the
location string.

This is the back end counterpart for

http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3226

Reviewers: qcolombet

CC: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3227

llvm-svn: 205774

This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
   detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
   iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
   Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
   they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
   needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
   opaque.

Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.

The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.

However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]

llvm-svn: 203364

abstracting between a CallInst and an InvokeInst, both of which are IR
concepts.

llvm-svn: 202816

Instead, have a DataLayoutPass that holds one. This will allow parts of LLVM
don't don't handle passes to also use DataLayout.

llvm-svn: 202168

llvm-svn: 201833

225 is the default value of inline-threshold. This change will make sure
we have the same inlining behavior as prior to r200886.

As Chandler points out, even though we don't have code in our testing
suite that uses cold attribute, there are larger applications that do
use cold attribute.

r200886 + this commit intend to keep the same behavior as prior to r200886.
We can later on tune the inlinecold-threshold.

The main purpose of r200886 is to help performance of instrumentation based
PGO before we actually hook up inliner with analysis passes such as BPI and BFI.
For instrumentation based PGO, we try to increase inlining of hot functions and
reduce inlining of cold functions by setting inlinecold-threshold.

Another option suggested by Chandler is to use a boolean flag that controls
if we should use OptSizeThreshold for cold functions. The default value
of the boolean flag should not change the current behavior. But it gives us
less freedom in controlling inlining of cold functions.

llvm-svn: 200898

Added command line option inlinecold-threshold to set threshold for inlining
functions with cold attribute. Listen to the cold attribute when it would
decrease the inline threshold.

llvm-svn: 200886

CallGraph.

This makes the CallGraph a totally generic analysis object that is the
container for the graph data structure and the primary interface for
querying and manipulating it. The pass logic is separated into its own
class. For compatibility reasons, the pass provides wrapper methods for
most of the methods on CallGraph -- they all just forward.

This will allow the new pass manager infrastructure to provide its own
analysis pass that constructs the same CallGraph object and makes it
available. The idea is that in the new pass manager, the analysis pass's
'run' method returns a concrete analysis 'result'. Here, that result is
a 'CallGraph'. The 'run' method will typically do only minimal work,
deferring much of the work into the implementation of the result object
in order to be lazy about computing things, but when (like DomTree)
there is *some* up-front computation, the analysis does it prior to
handing the result back to the querying pass.

I know some of this is fairly ugly. I'm happy to change it around if
folks can suggest a cleaner interim state, but there is going to be some
amount of unavoidable ugliness during the transition period. The good
thing is that this is very limited and will naturally go away when the
old pass infrastructure goes away. It won't hang around to bother us
later.

Next up is the initial new-PM-style call graph analysis. =]

llvm-svn: 195722

Duncan pointed out a mistake in my fix in r186425 when only one of the allocas
being compared had the target-default alignment. This is essentially his
suggested solution. Thanks!

llvm-svn: 186510

For safety, the inliner cannot decrease the allignment on an alloca when
merging it with another.

I've included two variants of the test case for this: one with DataLayout
available, and one without. When DataLayout is not available, if only one of
the allocas uses the default alignment (getAlignment() == 0), then they cannot
be safely merged.

llvm-svn: 186425

SSPStrong applies a heuristic to insert stack protectors in these situations:

* A Protector is required for functions which contain an array, regardless of
  type or length.

* A Protector is required for functions which contain a structure/union which
  contains an array, regardless of type or length.  Note, there is no limit to
  the depth of nesting.

* A protector is required when the address of a local variable (i.e., stack
  based variable) is exposed. (E.g., such as through a local whose address is
  taken as part of the RHS of an assignment or a local whose address is taken as
  part of a function argument.)

This patch implements the SSPString attribute to be equivalent to
SSPRequired. This will change in a subsequent patch.

llvm-svn: 173230

into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.

There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.

The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.

I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).

I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.

llvm-svn: 171366

directly.

This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.

llvm-svn: 171253

getAnalysisUsage implementations.

llvm-svn: 171157

Rename the 'Attributes' class to 'Attribute'. It's going to represent a single attribute in the future.

llvm-svn: 170502

Better controls the inlining of functions when the caller function has MinSize attribute.
Basically, when the caller function has this attribute, we do not "force" the inlining
of callee functions carrying the InlineHint attribute (i.e., functions defined with
inline keyword)

llvm-svn: 170065

Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.

Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]

llvm-svn: 169131

Have 'addFnAttr' take the attribute enum value. Then have it build the attribute object and add it appropriately. No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 165595

We use the enums to query whether an Attributes object has that attribute. The
opaque layer is responsible for knowing where that specific attribute is stored.

llvm-svn: 165488

llvm-svn: 165402

The hasFnAttr method has been replaced by querying the Attributes explicitly. No
intended functionality change.

llvm-svn: 164725

llvm-svn: 163808

This disables malloc-specific optimization when -fno-builtin (or -ffreestanding)
is specified. This has been a problem for a long time but became more severe
with the recent memory builtin improvements.

Since the memory builtin functions are used everywhere, this required passing
TLI in many places. This means that functions that now have an optional TLI
argument, like RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadFunctions, won't remove dead
mallocs anymore if the TLI argument is missing. I've updated most passes to do
the right thing.

Fixes PR13694 and probably others.

llvm-svn: 162841

llvm-svn: 157885

inline threshold if the global inline threshold is lower (as for -Oz).

Reviewed by Chandler Carruth and Bill Wendling.

llvm-svn: 157323

Yea, 'NumCallerCallersAnalyzed' isn't a great name, suggestions welcome.

llvm-svn: 154492

As a side note, I really dislike array_pod_sort... Do we really still
care about any STL implementations that get this so wrong? Does libc++?

llvm-svn: 153834

interfaces. These methods were used in the old inline cost system where
there was a persistent cache that had to be updated, invalidated, and
cleared. We're now doing more direct computations that don't require
this intricate dance. Even if we resume some level of caching, it would
almost certainly have a simpler and more narrow interface than this.

llvm-svn: 153813

on a per-callsite walk of the called function's instructions, in
breadth-first order over the potentially reachable set of basic blocks.

This is a major shift in how inline cost analysis works to improve the
accuracy and rationality of inlining decisions. A brief outline of the
algorithm this moves to:

- Build a simplification mapping based on the callsite arguments to the
  function arguments.
- Push the entry block onto a worklist of potentially-live basic blocks.
- Pop the first block off of the *front* of the worklist (for
  breadth-first ordering) and walk its instructions using a custom
  InstVisitor.
- For each instruction's operands, re-map them based on the
  simplification mappings available for the given callsite.
- Compute any simplification possible of the instruction after
  re-mapping, and store that back int othe simplification mapping.
- Compute any bonuses, costs, or other impacts of the instruction on the
  cost metric.
- When the terminator is reached, replace any conditional value in the
  terminator with any simplifications from the mapping we have, and add
  any successors which are not proven to be dead from these
  simplifications to the worklist.
- Pop the next block off of the front of the worklist, and repeat.
- As soon as the cost of inlining exceeds the threshold for the
  callsite, stop analyzing the function in order to bound cost.

The primary goal of this algorithm is to perfectly handle dead code
paths. We do not want any code in trivially dead code paths to impact
inlining decisions. The previous metric was *extremely* flawed here, and
would always subtract the average cost of two successors of
a conditional branch when it was proven to become an unconditional
branch at the callsite. There was no handling of wildly different costs
between the two successors, which would cause inlining when the path
actually taken was too large, and no inlining when the path actually
taken was trivially simple. There was also no handling of the code
*path*, only the immediate successors. These problems vanish completely
now. See the added regression tests for the shiny new features -- we
skip recursive function calls, SROA-killing instructions, and high cost
complex CFG structures when dead at the callsite being analyzed.

Switching to this algorithm required refactoring the inline cost
interface to accept the actual threshold rather than simply returning
a single cost. The resulting interface is pretty bad, and I'm planning
to do lots of interface cleanup after this patch.

Several other refactorings fell out of this, but I've tried to minimize
them for this patch. =/ There is still more cleanup that can be done
here. Please point out anything that you see in review.

I've worked really hard to try to mirror at least the spirit of all of
the previous heuristics in the new model. It's not clear that they are
all correct any more, but I wanted to minimize the change in this single
patch, it's already a bit ridiculous. One heuristic that is *not* yet
mirrored is to allow inlining of functions with a dynamic alloca *if*
the caller has a dynamic alloca. I will add this back, but I think the
most reasonable way requires changes to the inliner itself rather than
just the cost metric, and so I've deferred this for a subsequent patch.
The test case is XFAIL-ed until then.

As mentioned in the review mail, this seems to make Clang run about 1%
to 2% faster in -O0, but makes its binary size grow by just under 4%.
I've looked into the 4% growth, and it can be fixed, but requires
changes to other parts of the inliner.

llvm-svn: 153812

size bloat. Unfortunately, I expect this to disable the majority of the
benefit from r152737. I'm hopeful at least that it will fix PR12345. To
explain this requires... quite a bit of backstory I'm afraid.

TL;DR: The change in r152737 actually did The Wrong Thing for
linkonce-odr functions. This change makes it do the right thing. The
benefits we saw were simple luck, not any actual strategy. Benchmark
numbers after a mini-blog-post so that I've written down my thoughts on
why all of this works and doesn't work...

To understand what's going on here, you have to understand how the
"bottom-up" inliner actually works. There are two fundamental modes to
the inliner:

1) Standard fixed-cost bottom-up inlining. This is the mode we usually
   think about. It walks from the bottom of the CFG up to the top,
   looking at callsites, taking information about the callsite and the
   called function and computing th expected cost of inlining into that
   callsite. If the cost is under a fixed threshold, it inlines. It's
   a touch more complicated than that due to all the bonuses, weights,
   etc. Inlining the last callsite to an internal function gets higher
   weighth, etc. But essentially, this is the mode of operation.

2) Deferred bottom-up inlining (a term I just made up). This is the
   interesting mode for this patch an r152737. Initially, this works
   just like mode #1, but once we have the cost of inlining into the
   callsite, we don't just compare it with a fixed threshold. First, we
   check something else. Let's give some names to the entities at this
   point, or we'll end up hopelessly confused. We're considering
   inlining a function 'A' into its callsite within a function 'B'. We
   want to check whether 'B' has any callers, and whether it might be
   inlined into those callers. If so, we also check whether inlining 'A'
   into 'B' would block any of the opportunities for inlining 'B' into
   its callers. We take the sum of the costs of inlining 'B' into its
   callers where that inlining would be blocked by inlining 'A' into
   'B', and if that cost is less than the cost of inlining 'A' into 'B',
   then we skip inlining 'A' into 'B'.

Now, in order for #2 to make sense, we have to have some confidence that
we will actually have the opportunity to inline 'B' into its callers
when cheaper, *and* that we'll be able to revisit the decision and
inline 'A' into 'B' if that ever becomes the correct tradeoff. This
often isn't true for external functions -- we can see very few of their
callers, and we won't be able to re-consider inlining 'A' into 'B' if
'B' is external when we finally see more callers of 'B'. There are two
cases where we believe this to be true for C/C++ code: functions local
to a translation unit, and functions with an inline definition in every
translation unit which uses them. These are represented as internal
linkage and linkonce-odr (resp.) in LLVM. I enabled this logic for
linkonce-odr in r152737.

Unfortunately, when I did that, I also introduced a subtle bug. There
was an implicit assumption that the last caller of the function within
the TU was the last caller of the function in the program. We want to
bonus the last caller of the function in the program by a huge amount
for inlining because inlining that callsite has very little cost.
Unfortunately, the last caller in the TU of a linkonce-odr function is
*not* the last caller in the program, and so we don't want to apply this
bonus. If we do, we can apply it to one callsite *per-TU*. Because of
the way deferred inlining works, when it sees this bonus applied to one
callsite in the TU for 'B', it decides that inlining 'B' is of the
*utmost* importance just so we can get that final bonus. It then
proceeds to essentially force deferred inlining regardless of the actual
cost tradeoff.

The result? PR12345: code bloat, code bloat, code bloat. Another result
is getting *damn* lucky on a few benchmarks, and the over-inlining
exposing critically important optimizations. I would very much like
a list of benchmarks that regress after this change goes in, with
bitcode before and after. This will help me greatly understand what
opportunities the current cost analysis is missing.

Initial benchmark numbers look very good. WebKit files that exhibited
the worst of PR12345 went from growing to shrinking compared to Clang
with r152737 reverted.

- Bootstrapped Clang is 3% smaller with this change.
- Bootstrapped Clang -O0 over a single-source-file of lib/Lex is 4%
  faster with this change.

Please let me know about any other performance impact you see. Thanks to
Nico for reporting and urging me to actually fix, Richard Smith, Duncan
Sands, Manuel Klimek, and Benjamin Kramer for talking through the issues
today.

llvm-svn: 153506

to instead rely on much more generic and powerful instruction
simplification in the function cloner (and thus inliner).

This teaches the pruning function cloner to use instsimplify rather than
just the constant folder to fold values during cloning. This can
simplify a large number of things that constant folding alone cannot
begin to touch. For example, it will realize that 'or' and 'and'
instructions with certain constant operands actually become constants
regardless of what their other operand is. It also can thread back
through the caller to perform simplifications that are only possible by
looking up a few levels. In particular, GEPs and pointer testing tend to
fold much more heavily with this change.

This should (in some cases) have a positive impact on compile times with
optimizations on because the inliner itself will simply avoid cloning
a great deal of code. It already attempted to prune proven-dead code,
but now it will be use the stronger simplifications to prove more code
dead.

llvm-svn: 153403