Register the Asm Printer for the ppc64le target.

This fills in a spot that was missed in an earlier change (r187179).

llvm-svn: 202861

Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.

This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.

llvm-svn: 202821

name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction
in the IR.... You see where this is going.

Another step of modularizing the support library.

llvm-svn: 202815

Now that the PowerPC backend can track individual CR bits as first-class
registers, we should also have a way of allocating them for inline asm
statements. Because these registers are only one bit, if an output variable is
implicitly cast to a larger integer size, we'll get an any_extend to that
larger type (this is part of the existing target-independent logic). As a
result, regardless of the size of the output type, only the first bit is
meaningful.

The constraint identifier "wc" has been chosen for this purpose. Although gcc
does not currently support allocating individual CR bits, this identifier
choice has been coordinated with the gcc PowerPC team, and will be marked as
reserved for this purpose in the gcc constraints.md file.

llvm-svn: 202657

Remove the old functions.

llvm-svn: 202636

llvm-svn: 202621

llvm-svn: 202618

This generalizes the code to eliminate extra truncs/exts around i1 bit
operations to also do the same on PPC64 for i32 bit operations. This eliminates
a fairly prevalent code wart:

int foo(int a) {
  return a == 5 ? 7 : 8;
}

On PPC64, because of the extension implied by the ABI, this would generate:

	cmplwi 0, 3, 5
	li 12, 8
	li 4, 7
	isel 3, 4, 12, 2
	rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32
	blr

where the 'rldicl 3, 3, 0, 32', the extension, is completely unnecessary. At
least for the single-BB case (which is all that the DAG combine mechanism can
handle), this unnecessary extension is no longer generated.

llvm-svn: 202600

The PPC isel instruction can fold 0 into the first operand (thus eliminating
the need to materialize a zero-containing register when the 'true' result of
the isel is 0). When the isel is fed by a bit register operation that we can
invert, do so as part of the bit-register-operation peephole routine.

llvm-svn: 202469

The CR bit tracking code broke PPC/Darwin; trying to get it working again...

(the darwin11 builder, which defaults to the darwin ABI when running PPC tests,
asserted when running test/CodeGen/PowerPC/inverted-bool-compares.ll)

llvm-svn: 202459

Cannot use negative numbers in case statements without running afoul of -Wc++11-narrowing.

llvm-svn: 202455

This change enables tracking i1 values in the PowerPC backend using the
condition register bits. These bits can be treated on PowerPC as separate
registers; individual bit operations (and, or, xor, etc.) are supported.
Tracking booleans in CR bits has several advantages:

 - Reduction in register pressure (because we no longer need GPRs to store
   boolean values).

 - Logical operations on booleans can be handled more efficiently; we used to
   have to move all results from comparisons into GPRs, perform promoted
   logical operations in GPRs, and then move the result back into condition
   register bits to be used by conditional branches. This can be very
   inefficient, because the throughput of these CR <-> GPR moves have high
   latency and low throughput (especially when other associated instructions
   are accounted for).

 - On the POWER7 and similar cores, we can increase total throughput by using
   the CR bits. CR bit operations have a dedicated functional unit.

Most of this is more-or-less mechanical: Adjustments were needed in the
calling-convention code, support was added for spilling/restoring individual
condition-register bits, and conditional branch instruction definitions taking
specific CR bits were added (plus patterns and code for generating bit-level
operations).

This is enabled by default when running at -O2 and higher. For -O0 and -O1,
where the ability to debug is more important, this feature is disabled by
default. Individual CR bits do not have assigned DWARF register numbers,
and storing values in CR bits makes them invisible to the debugger.

It is critical, however, that we don't move i1 values that have been promoted
to larger values (such as those passed as function arguments) into bit
registers only to quickly turn around and move the values back into GPRs (such
as happens when values are returned by functions). A pair of target-specific
DAG combines are added to remove the trunc/extends in:
  trunc(binary-ops(binary-ops(zext(x), zext(y)), ...)
and:
  zext(binary-ops(binary-ops(trunc(x), trunc(y)), ...)
In short, we only want to use CR bits where some of the i1 values come from
comparisons or are used by conditional branches or selects. To put it another
way, if we can do the entire i1 computation in GPRs, then we probably should
(on the POWER7, the GPR-operation throughput is higher, and for all cores, the
CR <-> GPR moves are expensive).

POWER7 test-suite performance results (from 10 runs in each configuration):

SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/mandel-2: 35% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/city/city: 21% speedup
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/automotive-susan: 23% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/huffbench: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/Large/sphereflake: 13% speedup
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/mandel-text: 10% speedup

SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit: 10% slowdown
MultiSource/Applications/lemon/lemon: 8% slowdown

llvm-svn: 202451

llvm-svn: 202295

We need to abort the formation of counter-register-based loops where there are
128-bit integer operations that might become function calls.

llvm-svn: 202192

Instead, have a DataLayoutPass that holds one. This will allow parts of LLVM
don't don't handle passes to also use DataLayout.

llvm-svn: 202168

No functionality change. Just reduces the noise of an upcoming patch.

llvm-svn: 202087

llvm-svn: 201833

TargetLoweringBase is implemented in CodeGen, so before this patch we had
a dependency fom Target to CodeGen. This would show up as a link failure of
llvm-stress when building with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON.

This fixes pr18900.

llvm-svn: 201711

r201608 made llvm corretly handle private globals with MachO. r201622 fixed
a bug in it and r201624 and r201625 were changes for using private linkage,
assuming that llvm would do the right thing.

They all got reverted because r201608 introduced a crash in LTO. This patch
includes a fix for that. The issue was that TargetLoweringObjectFile now has
to be initialized before we can mangle names of private globals. This is
trivially true during the normal codegen pipeline (the asm printer does it),
but LTO has to do it manually.

llvm-svn: 201700

This causes the LLVMgold plugin to segfault. More information on the
replies to r201608.

llvm-svn: 201669

The IR
@foo = private constant i32 42

is valid, but before this patch we would produce an invalid MachO from it. It
was invalid because it would use an L label in a section where the liker needs
the labels in order to atomize it.

One way of fixing it would be to just reject this IR in the backend, but that
would not be very front end friendly.

What this patch does is use an 'l' prefix in sections that we know the linker
requires symbols for atomizing them. This allows frontends to just use
private and not worry about which sections they go to or how the linker handles
them.

One small issue with this strategy is that now a symbol name depends on the
section, which is not available before codegen. This is not a problem in
practice. The reason is that it only happens with private linkage, which will
be ignored by the non codegen users (llvm-nm and llvm-ar).

llvm-svn: 201608

This is quiet a bit less confusing now that TargetData was renamed DataLayout.

llvm-svn: 201606

Re-commit: Demote EmitRawText call in AsmPrinter::EmitInlineAsm() and remove hasRawTextSupport() call

Summary:
AsmPrinter::EmitInlineAsm() will no longer use the EmitRawText() call for
targets with mature MC support. Such targets will always parse the inline
assembly (even when emitting assembly). Targets without mature MC support
continue to use EmitRawText() for assembly output.

The hasRawTextSupport() check in AsmPrinter::EmitInlineAsm() has been replaced
with MCAsmInfo::UseIntegratedAs which when true, causes the integrated assembler
to parse inline assembly (even when emitting assembly output). UseIntegratedAs
is set to true for targets that consider any failure to parse valid assembly
to be a bug. Target specific subclasses generally enable the integrated
assembler in their constructor. The default value can be overridden with
-no-integrated-as.

All tests that rely on inline assembly supporting invalid assembly (for example,
those that use mnemonics such as 'foo' or 'hello world') have been updated to
disable the integrated assembler.

Changes since review (and last commit attempt):
- Fixed test failures that were missed due to configuration of local build.
  (fixes crash.ll and a couple others).
- Fixed tests that happened to pass because the local build was on X86
  (should fix 2007-12-17-InvokeAsm.ll)
- mature-mc-support.ll's should no longer require all targets to be compiled.
  (should fix ARM and PPC buildbots)
- Object output (-filetype=obj and similar) now forces the integrated assembler
  to be enabled regardless of default setting or -no-integrated-as.
  (should fix SystemZ buildbots)

Reviewers: rafael

Reviewed By: rafael

CC: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2686

llvm-svn: 201333

Revert r201237+r201238: Demote EmitRawText call in AsmPrinter::EmitInlineAsm() and remove hasRawTextSupport() call

It introduced multiple test failures in the buildbots.

llvm-svn: 201241

Summary:
AsmPrinter::EmitInlineAsm() will no longer use the EmitRawText() call for targets with mature MC support. Such targets will always parse the inline assembly (even when emitting assembly). Targets without mature MC support continue to use EmitRawText() for assembly output.

The hasRawTextSupport() check in AsmPrinter::EmitInlineAsm() has been replaced with MCAsmInfo::UseIntegratedAs which when true, causes the integrated assembler to parse inline assembly (even when emitting assembly output). UseIntegratedAs is set to true for targets that consider any failure to parse valid assembly to be a bug. Target specific subclasses generally enable the integrated assembler in their constructor. The default value can be overridden with -no-integrated-as.

All tests that rely on inline assembly supporting invalid assembly (for example, those that use mnemonics such as 'foo' or 'hello world') have been updated to disable the integrated assembler.

Reviewers: rafael

Reviewed By: rafael

CC: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2686

llvm-svn: 201237

It is never null and it is not used in casts, so there is no reason to use a
pointer. This matches how we pass TM.

llvm-svn: 201025

llvm-svn: 201022

llvm-svn: 200890

On R600, some address spaces have more strict alignment
requirements than others.

llvm-svn: 200887

Clang itself was not using this. The only way to access it was via llc.

llvm-svn: 200862

As part of the cleanup done to enable the disassembler, the PPC instructions
now have a valid Size description field. This can now be used to replace some
custom logic in a few places to compute instruction sizes.

Patch by David Wiberg!

llvm-svn: 200623

The subtarget info is explicitly passed to the EncodeInstruction
method and we should use that subtarget info to influence any
encoding decisions.

llvm-svn: 200350

llvm-svn: 200349

llvm-svn: 200348

llvm-svn: 200345

At present, this handles .tc (error) and needs to be expanded to deal properly with .machine

llvm-svn: 200309

GPRC_NOR0 is not a subclass of GPRC (because it also contains the ZERO pseudo
register). As a result, we also need to check for it in the spilling code.

llvm-svn: 200288

code to see if we're emitting a function into a non-default
text section. This is still a less-than-ideal solution, but more
contained than r199871 to determine whether or not we're emitting
code into an array of comdat sections.

llvm-svn: 200269

With this the target streamers will be able to know the target features that
are in use.

llvm-svn: 200135

This has a few advantages:
* Only targets that use a MCTargetStreamer have to worry about it.
* There is never a MCTargetStreamer without a MCStreamer, so we can use a
  reference.
* A MCTargetStreamer can talk to the MCStreamer in its constructor.

llvm-svn: 200129