Typo in testcase.

llvm-svn: 207166

AllocaInst that was missing in one location.
Debug info for optimized code: Support variables that are on the stack and
described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.

Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.

This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine.ll testcase and included source

rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374

llvm-svn: 207165

This reverts commit 207130 for buildbot breakage.

llvm-svn: 207162

This reverts commit 207130 for buildbot breakage.

llvm-svn: 207159

of the dbg.value. This gets rid of tons of redundant variable DIEs in
subscopes.

rdar://problem/14874886, rdar://problem/16679936

llvm-svn: 207135

described by DBG_VALUEs during their lifetime.

Previously, when a variable was at a FrameIndex for any part of its
lifetime, this would shadow all other DBG_VALUEs and only a single
fbreg location would be emitted, which in fact is only valid for a small
range and not the entire lexical scope of the variable. The included
dbg-value-const-byref testcase demonstrates this.

This patch fixes this by
Local
- emitting dbg.value intrinsics for allocas that are passed by reference
- dropping all dbg.declares (they are now fully lowered to dbg.values)
SelectionDAG
- renamed constructors for SDDbgValue for better readability.
- fix UserValue::match() to handle indirect values correctly
- not inserting an MMI table entries for dbg.values that describe allocas.
- lowering dbg.values that describe allocas into *indirect* DBG_VALUEs.
CodeGenPrepare
- leaving dbg.values for an alloca were they are (see comment)
Other
- regenerated/updated instcombine-intrinsics testcase and included source


rdar://problem/16679879
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3374

llvm-svn: 207130

These places are inconsequential in practice.

llvm-svn: 207021

definition below all of the header #include lines, lib/Transforms/...
edition.

This one is tricky for two reasons. We again have a couple of passes
that define something else before the includes as well. I've sunk their
name macros with the DEBUG_TYPE.

Also, InstCombine contains headers that need DEBUG_TYPE, so now those
headers #define and #undef DEBUG_TYPE around their code, leaving them
well formed modular headers. Fixing these headers was a large motivation
for all of these changes, as "leaky" macros of this form are hard on the
modules implementation.

llvm-svn: 206844

behavior based on other files defining DEBUG_TYPE, which means it cannot
define DEBUG_TYPE at all. This is actually better IMO as it forces folks
to define relevant DEBUG_TYPEs for their files. However, it requires all
files that currently use DEBUG(...) to define a DEBUG_TYPE if they don't
already. I've updated all such files in LLVM and will do the same for
other upstream projects.

This still leaves one important change in how LLVM uses the DEBUG_TYPE
macro going forward: we need to only define the macro *after* header
files have been #include-ed. Previously, this wasn't possible because
Debug.h required the macro to be pre-defined. This commit removes that.
By defining DEBUG_TYPE after the includes two things are fixed:

- Header files that need to provide a DEBUG_TYPE for some inline code
  can do so by defining the macro before their inline code and undef-ing
  it afterward so the macro does not escape.

- We no longer have rampant ODR violations due to including headers with
  different DEBUG_TYPE definitions. This may be mostly an academic
  violation today, but with modules these types of violations are easy
  to check for and potentially very relevant.

Where necessary to suppor headers with DEBUG_TYPE, I have moved the
definitions below the includes in this commit. I plan to move the rest
of the DEBUG_TYPE macros in LLVM in subsequent commits; this one is big
enough.

The comments in Debug.h, which were hilariously out of date already,
have been updated to reflect the recommended practice going forward.

llvm-svn: 206822

The -tailcallelim pass should be checking if byval or inalloca args can
be captured before marking calls as tail calls.  This was the real root
cause of PR7272.

With a better fix in place, revert the inliner change from r105255.  The
test case it introduced still passes and has been moved to
test/Transforms/Inline/byval-tail-call.ll.

Reviewers: chandlerc

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3403

llvm-svn: 206789

Summary:
This prevents the discriminator generation pass from triggering if
the DWARF version being used in the module is prior to 4.

Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie

CC: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3413

llvm-svn: 206507

 lib/Analysis/IPA/InlineCost.cpp         |   18 ------------------
 lib/Analysis/RegionPass.cpp             |    1 -
 lib/Analysis/TypeBasedAliasAnalysis.cpp |    1 -
 lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp  |   21 ---------------------
 lib/Transforms/Utils/LCSSA.cpp          |    2 --
 lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp   |    6 ------
 utils/TableGen/AsmWriterEmitter.cpp     |   13 -------------
 utils/TableGen/DFAPacketizerEmitter.cpp |    7 -------
 utils/TableGen/IntrinsicEmitter.cpp     |    2 --
 9 files changed, 71 deletions(-)

llvm-svn: 206506

appear in the InlineFunctionInfo.

llvm-svn: 206308

beginning of the first new block after inlining.

llvm-svn: 206307

Also updated as many loops as I could find using df_begin/idf_begin -
strangely I found no uses of idf_begin. Is that just used out of tree?

Also a few places couldn't use df_begin because either they used the
member functions of the depth first iterators or had specific ordering
constraints (I added a comment in the latter case).

Based on a patch by Jim Grosbach. (Jim - you just had iterator_range<T>
where you needed iterator_range<idf_iterator<T>>)

llvm-svn: 206016

llvm-svn: 204981

Summary:
Tested with a unit test because we don't appear to have any transforms
that use this other than ASan, I think.

Fixes PR17935.

Reviewers: nicholas

CC: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3194

llvm-svn: 204866

This option caused LowerInvoke to generate code using SJLJ-based
exception handling, but there is no code left that interprets the
jmp_buf stack that the resulting code maintained (llvm.sjljeh.jblist).
This option has been obsolete for a while, and replaced by
SjLjEHPrepare.

This leaves the default behaviour of LowerInvoke, which is to convert
invokes to calls.

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3136

llvm-svn: 204388

llvm-svn: 204230

Also changes the iterators to return actual DI type over MDNode.

llvm-svn: 204130

This allows us to generate table lookups for code such as:

  unsigned test(unsigned x) {
    switch (x) {
      case 100: return 0;
      case 101: return 1;
      case 103: return 2;
      case 105: return 3;
      case 107: return 4;
      case 109: return 5;
      case 110: return 6;
      default: return f(x);
    }
  }

Since cases 102, 104, etc. are not constants, the lookup table has holes
in those positions. We therefore guard the table lookup with a bitmask check.

Patch by Jasper Neumann!

llvm-svn: 203694

llvm-svn: 203687

llvm-svn: 203662

llvm-svn: 203520

optimize a call to a llvm intrinsic to something that invovles a call to a C
library call, make sure it sets the right calling convention on the call.

e.g.
extern double pow(double, double);
double t(double x) {
  return pow(10, x);
}

Compiles to something like this for AAPCS-VFP:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
  %0 = call double @llvm.pow.f64(double 1.000000e+01, double %x)
  ret double %0
}

declare double @llvm.pow.f64(double, double) #1

Simplify libcall (part of instcombine) will turn the above into:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
  %__exp10 = call double @__exp10(double %x) #1
  ret double %__exp10
}

declare double @__exp10(double)

The pre-instcombine code works because calls to LLVM builtins are special.
Instruction selection will chose the right calling convention for the call.
However, the code after instcombine is wrong. The call to __exp10 will use
the C calling convention.

I can think of 3 options to fix this.

1. Make "C" calling convention just work since the target should know what CC
   is being used.

   This doesn't work because each function can use different CC with the "pcs"
   attribute.

2. Have Clang add the right CC keyword on the calls to LLVM builtin.

   This will work but it doesn't match the LLVM IR specification which states
   these are "Standard C Library Intrinsics".

3. Fix simplify libcall so the resulting calls to the C routines will have the
   proper CC keyword. e.g.
   %__exp10 = call arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @__exp10(double %x) #1

   This works and is the solution I implemented here.

Both solutions #2 and #3 would work. After carefully considering the pros and
cons, I decided to implement #3 for the following reasons.

1. It doesn't change the "spec" of the intrinsics.
2. It's a self-contained fix.

There are a couple of potential downsides.
1. There could be other places in the optimizer that is broken in the same way
   that's not addressed by this.
2. There could be other calling conventions that need to be propagated by
   simplify-libcall that's not handled.

But for now, this is the fix that I'm most comfortable with.

llvm-svn: 203488

No change in functionality.

llvm-svn: 203413

This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
   detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
   iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
   Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
   they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
   needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
   opaque.

Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.

The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.

However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]

llvm-svn: 203364

This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.

llvm-svn: 203083

already lives.

llvm-svn: 203046

already lives.

llvm-svn: 203038

llvm-svn: 202957

llvm-svn: 202953

a bit surprising, as the class is almost entirely abstracted away from
any particular IR, however it encodes the comparsion predicates which
mutate ranges as ICmp predicate codes. This is reasonable as they're
used for both instructions and constants. Thus, it belongs in the IR
library with instructions and constants.

llvm-svn: 202838

hardcoded to use IR BasicBlocks.

llvm-svn: 202835

instructions.

llvm-svn: 202834

IR types.

llvm-svn: 202827

Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.

This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.

llvm-svn: 202821

obviously is coupled to the IR.

llvm-svn: 202818

abstracting between a CallInst and an InvokeInst, both of which are IR
concepts.

llvm-svn: 202816

name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction
in the IR.... You see where this is going.

Another step of modularizing the support library.

llvm-svn: 202815