llvm-svn: 121838

   which is simpler than finding a place to insert in BB.
 - Don't perform the 'if condition hoisting' xform on certain
   i1 PHIs, as it interferes with switch formation.

This re-fixes "example 7", without breaking the world hopefully.

llvm-svn: 121764

first, it can kick in on blocks whose conditions have been
folded to a constant, even though one of the edges will be
trivially folded.

second, it doesn't clean up the "if diamond" that it just 
eliminated away.  This is a problem because other simplifycfg
xforms kick in depending on the order of block visitation,
causing pointless work.

llvm-svn: 121762

breaking the selfhost builds, though I can't fathom how.

llvm-svn: 121761

when all 2-entry phis are simplified away.

llvm-svn: 121760

don't print it unless the xform happens.

llvm-svn: 121758

llvm-svn: 121757

llvm-svn: 121756

llvm-svn: 121755

GetIfCondition faster by avoiding pred_iterator.  No
really interesting change.

llvm-svn: 121754

code a bit, switch from constant folding to instsimplify.

llvm-svn: 121751

work, but fixes 400.perlbmk.

llvm-svn: 121749

Fix recent buildbot breakage by pulling SimplifyCFG back to its state as of r121694, the most recent state
where I'm confident there were no crashes or miscompilations.  XFAIL the test added since then for now.

llvm-svn: 121733

temporarily disable part of my previous patch, which causes an iterator invalidation issue, causing a crash on some versions of perlbmk.

llvm-svn: 121728

llvm-svn: 121711

llvm-svn: 121705

'and' case.

llvm-svn: 121695

I can track down a miscompile.  This should bring the buildbots
back to life

llvm-svn: 121693

when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches.  This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320

On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:

_crud:                                  ## @crud
## BB#0:                                ## %entry
	cmpb	$33, %dil
	jb	LBB0_4
## BB#1:                                ## %switch.early.test
	addb	$-34, %dil
	cmpb	$58, %dil
	ja	LBB0_3
## BB#2:                                ## %switch.early.test
	movzbl	%dil, %eax
	movabsq	$288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
	btq	%rax, %rcx
	jb	LBB0_4
LBB0_3:                                 ## %lor.rhs
	xorl	%eax, %eax
	ret
LBB0_4:                                 ## %lor.end
	movl	$1, %eax
	ret

llvm-svn: 121690

llvm-svn: 121689

per terminator kind.

llvm-svn: 121688

llvm-svn: 121687

doing a cfg search for every block simplified.

llvm-svn: 121686

llvm-svn: 121685

llvm-svn: 121684

getSinglePredecessor to simplify code.

llvm-svn: 121683

llvm-svn: 121681

'or sequence' that it doesn't understand.  This allows us to optimize
something insane like this:

int crud (unsigned char c, unsigned x)
 {
   if(((((((((( (int) c <= 32 ||
                    (int) c == 46) || (int) c == 44)
                  || (int) c == 58) || (int) c == 59) || (int) c == 60)
               || (int) c == 62) || (int) c == 34) || (int) c == 92)
            || (int) c == 39) != 0)
     foo();
 }

into:

define i32 @crud(i8 zeroext %c, i32 %x) nounwind ssp noredzone {
entry:
  %cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
  br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %switch.early.test

switch.early.test:                                ; preds = %entry
  switch i8 %c, label %if.end [
    i8 39, label %if.then
    i8 44, label %if.then
    i8 58, label %if.then
    i8 59, label %if.then
    i8 60, label %if.then
    i8 62, label %if.then
    i8 46, label %if.then
    i8 92, label %if.then
    i8 34, label %if.then
  ]

by pulling the < comparison out ahead of the newly formed switch.

llvm-svn: 121680

llvm-svn: 121678

llvm-svn: 121676

llvm-svn: 121675

bootstrap buildbot tripped over.

llvm-svn: 121674

llvm-svn: 121673

llvm-svn: 121672

or'd conditions.  Previously we'd compile something like this:

int crud (unsigned char c) {
   return c == 62 || c == 34 || c == 92;
}

into:

  switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
    i8 62, label %lor.end
    i8 34, label %lor.end
  ]

lor.rhs:                                          ; preds = %entry
  %cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
  br label %lor.end

lor.end:                                          ; preds = %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
  %0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ]
  %lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
  ret i32 %lor.ext

which failed to merge the compare-with-92 into the switch.  With this patch
we simplify this all the way to:

  switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
    i8 62, label %lor.end
    i8 34, label %lor.end
    i8 92, label %lor.end
  ]

lor.rhs:                                          ; preds = %entry
  br label %lor.end

lor.end:                                          ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
  %0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ false, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
  %lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
  ret i32 %lor.ext

which is much better for codegen's switch lowering stuff.  This kicks in 33 times
on 176.gcc (for example) cutting 103 instructions off the generated code.

llvm-svn: 121671

llvm-svn: 121669

location in simplifycfg.  In the old days, SimplifyCFG was never run on
the entry block, so we had to scan over all preds of the BB passed into
simplifycfg to do this xform, now we can just check blocks ending with
a condbranch.  This avoids a scan over all preds of every simplified 
block, which should be a significant compile-time perf win on functions
with lots of edges.  No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 121668

llvm-svn: 121667

llvm-svn: 121664

  (indirectbr (select cond, blockaddress(@fn, BlockA),
                            blockaddress(@fn, BlockB)))
into
  (br cond, BlockA, BlockB).

llvm-svn: 120943