Use an explicit LiveRange class to represent ranges instead of an std::pair.
This is a minor cleanup, but is really intended to make a future patch simpler
and less invasive.

Alkis, could you please take a look at LiveInterval::liveAt?  I suspect that
you can add an operator<(unsigned) to LiveRange, allowing us to speed up the
upper_bound call by quite a bit (this would also apply to other callers of
upper/lower_bound).  I would do it myself, but I still don't understand that
crazy liveAt function, despite the comment. :)

Basically I would like to see this:
    LiveRange dummy(index, index+1);
    Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(),
                                                ranges.end(),
                                                dummy);

Turn into:
    Ranges::const_iterator r = std::upper_bound(ranges.begin(),
                                                ranges.end(),
                                                index);

llvm-svn: 15130