to a class template. For example, the template-id 'vector<int>' now
has a nice, sugary type in the type system. What we can do now:

  - Parse template-ids like 'vector<int>' (where 'vector' names a
    class template) and form proper types for them in the type system.
  - Parse icky template-ids like 'A<5>' and 'A<(5 > 0)>' properly,
    using (sadly) a bool in the parser to tell it whether '>' should
    be treated as an operator or not.

This is a baby-step, with major problems and limitations:
  - There are currently two ways that we handle template arguments
  (whether they are types or expressions). These will be merged, and,
  most likely, TemplateArg will disappear.
  - We don't have any notion of the declaration of class template
  specializations or of template instantiations, so all template-ids
  are fancy names for 'int' :)

llvm-svn: 64153