Skip to content
  • Duncan Sands's avatar
    I don't see any point in having both eh.selector.i32 and eh.selector.i64, · 8e6ccb65
    Duncan Sands authored
    so get rid of eh.selector.i64 and rename eh.selector.i32 to eh.selector.
    Likewise for eh.typeid.for.  This aligns us with gcc, which always uses a
    32 bit value for the selector on all platforms.  My understanding is that
    the register allocator used to assert if the selector intrinsic size didn't
    match the pointer size, and this was the reason for introducing the two
    variants.  However my testing shows that this is no longer the case (I
    fixed some bugs in selector lowering yesterday, and some more today in the
    fastisel path; these might have caused the original problems).
    
    llvm-svn: 84106
    8e6ccb65
Loading