undefs in branches/switches, we have two cases: a branch on a literal
undef or a branch on a symbolic value which is undef.  If we have a
literal undef, the code was correct: forcing it to a constant is the
right thing to do.

If we have a branch on a symbolic value that is undef, we should force
the symbolic value to a constant, which then makes the successor block
live.  Forcing the condition of the branch to being a constant isn't 
safe if later paths become live and the value becomes overdefined.  This
is the case that 'forcedconstant' is designed to handle, so just use it.

This fixes rdar://7765019 but there is no good testcase for this, the
one I have is too insane to be useful in the future.

llvm-svn: 100478