Fix an over-constrained assertion in MachineFunction::addLiveIn.
The assertion was checking that the virtual register VReg used to represent the physical register PReg uses the same register class as the one passed to MachineFunction::addLiveIn. This is over-constraining because it is sufficient to check that the register class of VReg (VRegRC) is a subclass of the register class of PReg (PRegRC) and that VRegRC contains PReg. Indeed, if VReg gets constrained because of some operation constraints between two calls of MachineFunction::addLiveIn, the original assertion cannot match. This fixes <rdar://problem/15633429>. llvm-svn: 197097
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment