Fix legalization of SETCC with promoted integer intrinsics

If the input operands to SETCC are promoted, we need to make sure that we
either use the promoted form of both operands (or neither); a mixture is not
allowed. This can happen, for example, if a target has a custom promoted
i1-returning intrinsic (where i1 is not a legal type). In this case, we need to
use the promoted form of both operands.

This change only augments the behavior of the existing logic in the case where
the input types (which may or may not have already been legalized) disagree,
and should not affect existing target code because this case would otherwise
cause an assert in the SETCC operand promotion code.

This will be covered by (essentially all of the) tests for the new PPCCTRLoops
infrastructure.

llvm-svn: 181926