Skip to content
Commit 249fde85 authored by Fangrui Song's avatar Fangrui Song
Browse files

[ELF][ARM][AARCH64][MIPS][PPC] Simplify the logic to create R_*_RELATIVE for...

[ELF][ARM][AARCH64][MIPS][PPC] Simplify the logic to create R_*_RELATIVE for absolute relocation types in writable sections

Summary:
Our rule to create R_*_RELATIVE for absolute relocation types were
loose. D63121 made it stricter but it failed to create R_*_RELATIVE for
R_ARM_TARGET1 and R_PPC64_TOC. rLLD363236 worked around that by
reinstating the original behavior for ARM and PPC64.

This patch is an attempt to simplify the logic.

Note, in ld.bfd, R_ARM_TARGET2 --target2=abs also creates
R_ARM_RELATIVE. This seems a very uncommon scenario (moreover,
--target2=got-rel is the default), so I do not implement any logic
related to it.

Also, delete R_AARCH64_ABS32 from AArch64::getDynRel. We don't have
working ILP32 support yet. Allowing it would create an incorrect
R_AARCH64_RELATIVE.

For MIPS, the (if SymbolRel, then RelativeRel) code is to keep its
behavior unchanged.

Note, in ppc64-abs64-dyn.s, R_PPC64_TOC gets an incorrect addend because
computeAddend() doesn't compute the correct address. We seem to have the
wrong behavior for a long time. The important thing seems that a dynamic
relocation R_PPC64_TOC should not be created as the dynamic loader will
error R_PPC64_TOC is not supported.

Reviewers: atanasyan, grimar, peter.smith, ruiu, sfertile, espindola

Reviewed By: ruiu

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63383

llvm-svn: 363928
parent ffed2c96
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment