Cmp peephole optimization isn't always safe for signed arithmetics.
int tries = INT_MAX; while (tries > 0) { tries--; } The check should be: subs r4, #1 cmp r4, #0 bgt LBB0_1 The subs can set the overflow V bit when r4 is INT_MAX+1 (which loop canonicalization apparently does in this case). cmp #0 would have cleared it while not changing the N and Z bits. Since BGT is dependent on the V bit, i.e. (N == V) && !Z, it is not safe to eliminate the cmp #0. rdar://9172742 llvm-svn: 128179
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment