Skip to content
Commit 582e1410 authored by Mikael Holmen's avatar Mikael Holmen
Browse files

[SROA] Really remove associated dbg.declare when removing dead alloca

Summary:
There already was code that tried to remove the dbg.declare, but that code
was placed after we had called
 I->replaceAllUsesWith(UndefValue::get(I->getType()));
on the alloca, so when we searched for the relevant dbg.declare, we
couldn't find it.

Now we do the search before we call RAUW so there is a chance to find it.

An existing testcase needed update due to this. Two dbg.declare with undef
were removed and then suddenly one of the two CHECKS failed.

Before this patch we got

  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i24* undef, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 24)), !dbg !15
  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.prog_src_register* undef, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression()), !dbg !15
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32)), !dbg !15
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 24)), !dbg !15

and with it we get

  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 0, 32)), !dbg !15
  call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata i32 0, metadata !14, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_LLVM_fragment, 32, 24)), !dbg !15

However, the CHECKs in the testcase checked things in a silly order, so
they only passed since they found things in the first dbg.declare. Now
we changed the order of the checks and the test passes.

Reviewers: rnk

Reviewed By: rnk

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37900

llvm-svn: 313875
parent 4b13bfd9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment