Revert r240335.

This failed to solve the problem it was aimed at, and introduced just as many
issues as it resolved. Realistically, we need to deal with the possibility that
multiple modules might define different internal linkage symbols with the same
name, and this isn't a problem unless two such symbols are simultaneously
visible.

The case where two modules define equivalent internal linkage symbols is
handled by r252063: if lookup finds multiple sufficiently-similar entities from
different modules, we just pick one of them as an extension (but we keep them
separate).

llvm-svn: 252957