Include types when a definition's type differs from a prior declaration.
This is some really old code (took me a while to find the test cases) & the diagnostic text is slightly incorrect (it should really only apply to re/declarations/, redefinitions are an error regardless of whether the types match). Not sure if anyone cares about it, though. For now this just makes the diagnostic more clear in less obvious cases where the type of a declaration might not be explicitly written (eg: because it uses decltype) llvm-svn: 164313
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment