Don't define our own global 'endl' variable. While technically it had

internal linkage and so wasn't a patent bug, it doesn't make any sense
here. We can avoid even calling operator<< by just embedding the newline
in the string literals that were already being streamed out. It also
gives the impression of some line-ending agnosticisms which is not
present, and that flushing happens when it doesn't.

If we want to use std::endl, we could do that, but honestly it doesn't
seem remotely worth it. Using '\n' directly is much more clear when
working with raw_ostream.

It also happens to fix builds with old crufty GCC STL implementations
that include std::endl into the global namespace (or headers written to
be compatible with such atrocities).

llvm-svn: 179003