Fixed successor order for CFG basic blocks when handling: x && y. The bug

is best explained by illustration:

[ B2 ]
     1: x
     T: [B2.1] && ...
   Predecessors (1): B4
   Successors (2): B3 B1

Block "B3" should be the block where we evaluate "y" when "x" evaluates to
true. Previously we had the successor list reversed. Now this behavior matches
with how we handle other conditional branches.

Thanks to Nuno Lopes for reporting this problem.

llvm-svn: 45288