ARM: relax the atomic release barrier to "dmb ishst"
I believe the full "dmb ish" barrier is not required to guarantee release semantics for atomic operations. The weaker "dmb ishst" prevents previous operations being reordered with a store executed afterwards, which is enough. A key point to note (fortunately already correct) is that this barrier alone is *insufficient* for sequential consistency, no matter how liberally placed. llvm-svn: 185339
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment