enhance the "change or icmp's into switch" xform to handle one value in an

'or sequence' that it doesn't understand.  This allows us to optimize
something insane like this:

int crud (unsigned char c, unsigned x)
 {
   if(((((((((( (int) c <= 32 ||
                    (int) c == 46) || (int) c == 44)
                  || (int) c == 58) || (int) c == 59) || (int) c == 60)
               || (int) c == 62) || (int) c == 34) || (int) c == 92)
            || (int) c == 39) != 0)
     foo();
 }

into:

define i32 @crud(i8 zeroext %c, i32 %x) nounwind ssp noredzone {
entry:
  %cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
  br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %switch.early.test

switch.early.test:                                ; preds = %entry
  switch i8 %c, label %if.end [
    i8 39, label %if.then
    i8 44, label %if.then
    i8 58, label %if.then
    i8 59, label %if.then
    i8 60, label %if.then
    i8 62, label %if.then
    i8 46, label %if.then
    i8 92, label %if.then
    i8 34, label %if.then
  ]

by pulling the < comparison out ahead of the newly formed switch.

llvm-svn: 121680