Skip to content
Commit a9a0599b authored by Bill Wendling's avatar Bill Wendling
Browse files

There seems to be a (potential) hardware bug with the CMN instruction and

comparison with 0. These two pieces of code should give identical results:

  rsbs r1, r1, 0
  cmp  r0, r1
  mov  r0, #0
  it   ls
  mov  r0, #1

and:

  cmn  r0, r1
  mov  r0, #0
  it   ls
  mov  r0, #1

However, the CMN gives the *opposite* result when r1 is 0. This is because the
carry flag is set in the CMP case but not in the CMN case. In short, the CMP
instruction doesn't perform a truncate of the (logical) NOT of 0 plus the value
of r0 and the carry bit (because the "carry bit" parameter to AddWithCarry is
defined as 1 in this case, the carry flag will always be set when r0 >= 0). The
CMN instruction doesn't perform a NOT of 0 so there is never a "carry" when this
AddWithCarry is performed (because the "carry bit" parameter to AddWithCarry is
defined as 0).

The AddWithCarry in the CMP case seems to be relying upon the identity:

  ~x + 1 = -x

However when x is 0 and unsigned, this doesn't hold:

   x = 0
  ~x = 0xFFFF FFFF
  ~x + 1 = 0x1 0000 0000
  (-x = 0) != (0x1 0000 0000 = ~x + 1)

Therefore, we should disable *all* versions of CMN, especially when comparing
against zero, until we can limit when the CMN instruction is used (when we know
that the RHS is not 0) or when we have a hardware fix for this.

(See the ARM docs for the "AddWithCarry" pseudo-code.)

This is related to <rdar://problem/7569620>.

llvm-svn: 112176
parent af23e9a7
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment