Skip to content
Commit c9332218 authored by Chandler Carruth's avatar Chandler Carruth
Browse files

Factor out (some of) the checking for invalid forms of pointer

arithmetic into a couple of common routines. Use these to make the
messages more consistent in the various contexts, especially in terms of
consistently diagnosing binary operators with invalid types on both the
left- and right-hand side. Also, improve the grammar and wording of the
messages some, handling both two pointers and two (different) types.

The wording of function pointer arithmetic diagnostics still strikes me
as poorly phrased, and I worry this makes them slightly more awkward if
more consistent. I'm hoping to fix that with a follow-on patch and test
case that will also make them more helpful when a typedef or template
type parameter makes the type completely opaque.

Suggestions on better wording are very welcome, thanks to Richard Smith
for some initial help on that front.

llvm-svn: 133906
parent a61df3f8
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment