[X86][BtVer2] Fix latency/throughput of scalar integer MUL instructions.
Single operand MUL instructions that implicitly set EAX have the following latency/throughput profile (see below): imul %cl # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 1 - 1 JMul imul %cx # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 3 - 3 JMul imul %ecx # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 2 - 2 JMul imul %rcx # latency: 6cy - uOPs: 2 - 4 JMul mul %cl # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 1 - 1 JMul mul %cx # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 3 - 3 JMul mul %ecx # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 2 - 2 JMul mul %rcx # latency: 6cy - uOPs: 2 - 4 JMul Excluding the 64bit variant, which has a latency of 6cy, every other instruction has a latency of 3cy. However, the number of decoded macro-opcodes (as well as the resource cyles) depend on the MUL size. The two operand MULs have a more predictable profile (see below): imul %dx, %dx # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 1 - 1 JMul imul %edx, %edx # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 1 - 1 JMul imul %rdx, %rdx # latency: 6cy - uOPs: 1 - 4 JMul imul $3, %dx, %dx # latency: 4cy - uOPs: 2 - 2 JMul imul $3, %ecx, %ecx # latency: 3cy - uOPs: 1 - 1 JMul imul $3, %rdx, %rdx # latency: 6cy - uOPs: 1 - 4 JMul This patch updates the values in the Jaguar scheduling model and regenerates llvm-mca tests. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66547 llvm-svn: 369661
Loading
Please sign in to comment