Add a SCEV class and supporting code for sign-extend expressions.
This created an ambiguity for expandInTy to decide when to use sign-extension or zero-extension, but it turns out that most of its callers don't actually need a type conversion, now that LLVM types don't have explicit signedness. Drop expandInTy in favor of plain expand, and change the few places that actually need a type conversion to do it themselves. llvm-svn: 37591
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment