Skip to content
Commit d47fb5b3 authored by David Blaikie's avatar David Blaikie
Browse files

Don't try to construct debug LexicalScopes hierarchy for functions that do not...

Don't try to construct debug LexicalScopes hierarchy for functions that do not have top level debug information.

If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.

While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.

Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.

Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).

llvm-svn: 212203
parent a8c3509f
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment