Skip to content
Commit da68cbc4 authored by Duncan P. N. Exon Smith's avatar Duncan P. N. Exon Smith
Browse files

IR: RF_IgnoreMissingValues => RF_IgnoreMissingLocals, NFC

Clarify what this RemapFlag actually means.

  - Change the flag name to match its intended behaviour.
  - Clearly document that it's not supposed to affect globals.
  - Add a host of FIXMEs to indicate how to fix the behaviour to match
    the intent of the flag.

RF_IgnoreMissingLocals should only affect the behaviour of
RemapInstruction for function-local operands; namely, for operands of
type Argument, Instruction, and BasicBlock.  Currently, it is *only*
passed into RemapInstruction calls (and the transitive MapValue calls
that it makes).

When I split Metadata from Value I didn't understand the flag, and I
used it in a bunch of places for "global" metadata.

This commit doesn't have any functionality change, but prepares to
cleanup MapMetadata and MapValue.

llvm-svn: 265628
parent 5d4d715b
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Please to comment