[llvm-mca] Correctly handle zero-latency stores that consume pipeline resources.

This fixes PR37293.

We can have scheduling classes with no write latency entries, that still consume
processor resources. We don't want to treat those instructions as zero-latency
instructions; they still have to be issued to the underlying pipelines, so they
still consume resource cycles.

This is likely to be a regression which I have accidentally introduced at
revision 330807. Now, if an instruction has a non-empty set of write processor
resources, we conservatively treat it as a normal (i.e. non zero-latency)
instruction.

llvm-svn: 331193