[LVI] A better fix for the assertion error introduced by 267609
Essentially, I was using the wrong size function. For types which were sized, but not primitive, I wasn't getting a useful size for the operand and failed an assert. I fixed this, and also added a guard that the input is a sized type. Test case is for the original mistake. I'm not sure how to actually exercise the sized type check. llvm-svn: 267618
Loading
Please sign in to comment