[LoopIdiomRecognize] Don't convert a do while loop to ctlz.

This commit suppresses turning loops like this into "(bitwidth - ctlz(input))".

unsigned foo(unsigned input) {
  unsigned num = 0;
  do {
    ++num;
    input >>= 1;
  } while (input != 0);
  return num;
}

The loop version returns a value of 1 for both an input of 0 and an input of 1. Converting to a naive ctlz does not preserve that.

Theoretically we could do better if we checked isKnownNonZero or we could insert a select to handle the divergence. But until we have motivating cases for that, this is the easiest solution.

llvm-svn: 336864