[TargetLowering] x s% C == 0 fold: vector divisor with INT_MIN handling

Summary:
The general fold is only valid for positive divisors.
Which effectively means, it is invalid for `INT_MIN` divisors,
and we currently bailout if we see them.

But that is too strict, we can just fix-up the results.
For that, let's do a second computation 'in parallel':
```
Name: srem -> and
Pre: isPowerOf2(C)
%o = srem i8 %X, C
%r = icmp eq %o, 0
  =>
%n = and i8 %X, C-1
%r = icmp eq %n, 0
```
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Sup

And then just blend results: if the divisor was `INT_MIN`,
pick the value we got via bit-test,
else pick the value from general fold.

There's interesting observation - `ISD::ROTR` is set to
`LegalizeAction::Expand` before AVX512, so we should not
treat `INT_MIN` divisor as even; and as it can be seen
while `@test_srem_odd_even_one` improves on all run-lines,
`@test_srem_odd_even_INT_MIN` only improves for AVX512.

Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66300

llvm-svn: 369268