I was convinced that it's ok to allow a second i8 return value
to be returned in DL. LLVM's multiple-return-value support is not ABI-conforming; front-ends that wish to have code emitted that conforms to an ABI are currently expected to make arrangements for this on their own rather than assuming that multiple-return-values will automatically do the right thing. This commit doesn't fundamentally change this situation. llvm-svn: 67588
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment