backtrace locations.

Testcase forthcoming, but I wanted to get some testing here.

Should fix:

PR12323
PR12314
rdar://11091100

llvm-svn: 153471

153465 was incorrect. In this code we wanted to check that the pointer operand is of pointer type (and not vector type).

llvm-svn: 153468

relocations.  The algorithm is the same as
that for x86_64.  Scattered relocations, a
feature present in i386 but not on x86_64,
are not yet supported.

llvm-svn: 153466

llvm-svn: 153465

Fixes PR11950.

llvm-svn: 153463

llvm-svn: 153462

llvm-svn: 153458

llvm-svn: 153457

llvm-svn: 153456

llvm-svn: 153455

Original commit message:
Use the new range metadata in computeMaskedBits and add a new optimization to
instruction simplify that lets us remove an and when loading a boolean value.

llvm-svn: 153452

Thanks Andrey.

llvm-svn: 153451

llvm-svn: 153450

[tsan] treat vtable pointer updates in a special way (requires tbaa); fix a bug (forgot to return true after instrumenting); make sure the tsan tests are run

llvm-svn: 153448

llvm-svn: 153438

llvm-svn: 153436

Patch by Sylvestre Ledru!

llvm-svn: 153435

llvm-svn: 153433

llvm-svn: 153432

llvm-svn: 153429

llvm-svn: 153428

--enable-libcpp to projects/sample.

Patch by Dmitri Shubin with additional fixes by me.

llvm-svn: 153425

Fixes PR12050

llvm-svn: 153424

instruction simplify that lets us remove an and when loding a boolean value.

llvm-svn: 153423

llvm-svn: 153422

llvm-svn: 153421

constant-offsets of a common base using the generic GEP-walking logic
I added for computing pointer differences in the same situation.

llvm-svn: 153419

inbounds GEPs. This isn't really necessary for simplifying pointer
differences, but I'm planning to re-use the same code to simplify
pointer comparisons where it is necessary. Since real code almost
exclusively uses inbounds GEPs, it doesn't seem worth it to support the
extra complexity of turning it on and off. If anyone would like that
back, feel free to shout. Note that instcombine will still catch any of
these patterns.

llvm-svn: 153418

llvm-svn: 153415

llvm-svn: 153414

llvm-svn: 153412

Thanks Duncan.

llvm-svn: 153411

aggressively. There are lots of dire warnings about this being expensive
that seem to predate switching to the TrackingVH-based value remapper
that is automatically updated on RAUW. This makes it easy to not just
prune single-entry PHIs, but to fully simplify PHIs, and to recursively
simplify the newly inlined code to propagate PHINode simplifications.

This introduces a bit of a thorny problem though. We may end up
simplifying a branch condition to a constant when we fold PHINodes, and
we would like to nuke any dead blocks resulting from this so that time
isn't wasted continually analyzing them, but this isn't easy. Deleting
basic blocks *after* they are fully cloned and mapped into the new
function currently requires manually updating the value map. The last
piece of the simplification-during-inlining puzzle will require either
switching to WeakVH mappings or some other piece of refactoring. I've
left a FIXME in the testcase about this.

llvm-svn: 153410

a very (*very*) old version of Python (2.4?)

llvm-svn: 153409

* Removed test/lib/llvm.exp - it is no longer needed 
* Deleted the dg.exp reading code from test/lit.cfg. There are no dg.exp files
  left in the test suite so this code is no longer required. test/lit.cfg is
  now much shorter and clearer 
* Removed a lot of duplicate code in lit.local.cfg files that need access to
  the root configuration, by adding a "root" attribute to the TestingConfig
  object. This attribute is dynamically computed to provide the same
  information as was previously provided by the custom getRoot functions. 
* Documented the config.root attribute in docs/CommandGuide/lit.pod

llvm-svn: 153408

to instead rely on much more generic and powerful instruction
simplification in the function cloner (and thus inliner).

This teaches the pruning function cloner to use instsimplify rather than
just the constant folder to fold values during cloning. This can
simplify a large number of things that constant folding alone cannot
begin to touch. For example, it will realize that 'or' and 'and'
instructions with certain constant operands actually become constants
regardless of what their other operand is. It also can thread back
through the caller to perform simplifications that are only possible by
looking up a few levels. In particular, GEPs and pointer testing tend to
fold much more heavily with this change.

This should (in some cases) have a positive impact on compile times with
optimizations on because the inliner itself will simply avoid cloning
a great deal of code. It already attempted to prune proven-dead code,
but now it will be use the stronger simplifications to prove more code
dead.

llvm-svn: 153403

fire if anything ever invalidates the assumption of a terminator
instruction being unchanged throughout the routine.

I've convinced myself that the current definition of simplification
precludes such a transformation, so I think getting some asserts
coverage that we don't violate this agreement is sufficient to make this
code safe for the foreseeable future.

Comments to the contrary or other suggestions are of course welcome. =]
The bots are now happy with this code though, so it appears the bug here
has indeed been fixed.

llvm-svn: 153401

llvm-svn: 153400

list. This is a bad idea. ;] I'm hopeful this is the bug that's showing
up with the MSVC bots, but we'll see.

It is definitely unnecessary. InstSimplify won't do anything to
a terminator instruction, we don't need to even include it in the
iteration range. We can also skip the now dead terminator check,
although I've made it an assert to help document that this is an
important invariant.

I'm still a bit queasy about this because there is an implicit
assumption that the terminator instruction cannot be RAUW'ed by the
simplification code. While that appears to be true at the moment, I see
no guarantee that would ensure it remains true in the future. I'm
looking at the cleanest way to solve that...

llvm-svn: 153399

llvm-svn: 153398