- Nov 02, 2007
-
-
Duncan Sands authored
llvm-svn: 43639
-
- Nov 01, 2007
-
-
Duncan Sands authored
The meaning of getTypeSize was not clear - clarifying it is important now that we have x86 long double and arbitrary precision integers. The issue with long double is that it requires 80 bits, and this is not a multiple of its alignment. This gives a primitive type for which getTypeSize differed from getABITypeSize. For arbitrary precision integers it is even worse: there is the minimum number of bits needed to hold the type (eg: 36 for an i36), the maximum number of bits that will be overwriten when storing the type (40 bits for i36) and the ABI size (i.e. the storage size rounded up to a multiple of the alignment; 64 bits for i36). This patch removes getTypeSize (not really - it is still there but deprecated to allow for a gradual transition). Instead there is: (1) getTypeSizeInBits - a number of bits that suffices to hold all values of the type. For a primitive type, this is the minimum number of bits. For an i36 this is 36 bits. For x86 long double it is 80. This corresponds to gcc's TYPE_PRECISION. (2) getTypeStoreSizeInBits - the maximum number of bits that is written when storing the type (or read when reading it). For an i36 this is 40 bits, for an x86 long double it is 80 bits. This is the size alias analysis is interested in (getTypeStoreSize returns the number of bytes). There doesn't seem to be anything corresponding to this in gcc. (3) getABITypeSizeInBits - this is getTypeStoreSizeInBits rounded up to a multiple of the alignment. For an i36 this is 64, for an x86 long double this is 96 or 128 depending on the OS. This is the spacing between consecutive elements when you form an array out of this type (getABITypeSize returns the number of bytes). This is TYPE_SIZE in gcc. Since successive elements in a SequentialType (arrays, pointers and vectors) need to be aligned, the spacing between them will be given by getABITypeSize. This means that the size of an array is the length times the getABITypeSize. It also means that GEP computations need to use getABITypeSize when computing offsets. Furthermore, if an alloca allocates several elements at once then these too need to be aligned, so the size of the alloca has to be the number of elements multiplied by getABITypeSize. Logically speaking this doesn't have to be the case when allocating just one element, but it is simpler to also use getABITypeSize in this case. So alloca's and mallocs should use getABITypeSize. Finally, since gcc's only notion of size is that given by getABITypeSize, if you want to output assembler etc the same as gcc then getABITypeSize is the size you want. Since a store will overwrite no more than getTypeStoreSize bytes, and a read will read no more than that many bytes, this is the notion of size appropriate for alias analysis calculations. In this patch I have corrected all type size uses except some of those in ScalarReplAggregates, lib/Codegen, lib/Target (the hard cases). I will get around to auditing these too at some point, but I could do with some help. Finally, I made one change which I think wise but others might consider pointless and suboptimal: in an unpacked struct the amount of space allocated for a field is now given by the ABI size rather than getTypeStoreSize. I did this because every other place that reserves memory for a type (eg: alloca) now uses getABITypeSize, and I didn't want to make an exception for unpacked structs, i.e. I did it to make things more uniform. This only effects structs containing long doubles and arbitrary precision integers. If someone wants to pack these types more tightly they can always use a packed struct. llvm-svn: 43620
-
Evan Cheng authored
- Some code clean up. llvm-svn: 43606
-
- Oct 31, 2007
-
-
Duncan Sands authored
llvm-svn: 43551
-
Duncan Sands authored
llvm-svn: 43550
-
Owen Anderson authored
llvm-svn: 43542
-
Owen Anderson authored
llvm-svn: 43541
-
Dale Johannesen authored
llvm-svn: 43535
-
- Oct 30, 2007
-
-
Evan Cheng authored
llvm-svn: 43511
-
Duncan Sands authored
storing an i170 on a 32 bit machine. This is first promoted to a trunc-i170 store of an i256. On a little-endian machine this expands to a store of an i128 and a trunc-i42 store of an i128. The trunc-i42 store is further expanded to a trunc-i42 store of an i64, then to a store of an i32 and a trunc-i10 store of an i32. At this point the operand type is legal (i32) and expansion stops (legalization of the trunc-i10 needs to be handled in LegalizeDAG.cpp). On big-endian machines the high bits are stored first, and some bit-fiddling is needed in order to generate aligned stores. llvm-svn: 43499
-
Duncan Sands authored
offload to getStore rather than trying to handle both cases at once (the assertions for example assume the store really is truncating). llvm-svn: 43498
-
- Oct 29, 2007
-
-
Dan Gohman authored
llvm-svn: 43470
-
Evan Cheng authored
transformation. Previously, it's restricted by ensuring the number of load uses is one. Now the restriction is loosened up by allowing setcc uses to be "extended" (e.g. setcc x, c, eq -> setcc sext(x), sext(c), eq). llvm-svn: 43465
-
Dan Gohman authored
llvm-svn: 43464
-
- Oct 28, 2007
-
-
Duncan Sands authored
of offset and the alignment of ptr if these are both powers of 2. While the ptr alignment is guaranteed to be a power of 2, there is no reason to think that offset is. For example, if offset is 12 (the size of a long double on x86-32 linux) and the alignment of ptr is 8, then the alignment of ptr+offset will in general be 4, not 8. Introduce a function MinAlign, lifted from gcc, for computing the minimum guaranteed alignment. I've tried to fix up everywhere under lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/. I also changed some places that weren't wrong (because both values were a power of 2), as a defensive change against people copying and pasting the code. Hopefully someone who cares about alignment will review the rest of LLVM and fix up the remaining places. Since I'm on x86 I'm not very motivated to do this myself... llvm-svn: 43421
-
- Oct 26, 2007
-
-
Bill Wendling authored
FE. - Explicitly pass in the alignment of the load & store. - XFAIL 2007-10-23-UnalignedMemcpy.ll because llc has a bug that crashes on unaligned pointers. llvm-svn: 43398
-
- Oct 25, 2007
-
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 43359
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 43353
-
Duncan Sands authored
Use NVT rather than looking it up, since we have it to hand. llvm-svn: 43341
-
Duncan Sands authored
llvm-svn: 43340
-
Duncan Sands authored
llvm-svn: 43339
-
Dale Johannesen authored
llvm-svn: 43314
-
- Oct 24, 2007
-
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 43271
-
Bill Wendling authored
memcpy library function instead. llvm-svn: 43270
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 43264
-
- Oct 23, 2007
-
-
Bill Wendling authored
have their own custom memcpy lowering code. This code needs to be factored out into a target-independent lowering method with hooks to the backend. In the meantime, just call memcpy if we're trying to copy onto a stack. llvm-svn: 43262
-
Evan Cheng authored
llvm-svn: 43256
-
Evan Cheng authored
llvm-svn: 43249
-
- Oct 22, 2007
-
-
Evan Cheng authored
llvm-svn: 43227
-
Duncan Sands authored
funky bit-widths. llvm-svn: 43225
-
Duncan Sands authored
operations so they work right for integers with funky bit-widths. For example, consider extending i48 to i64 on a 32 bit machine. The i64 result is expanded to 2 x i32. We know that the i48 operand will be promoted to i64, then also expanded to 2 x i32. If we had the expanded promoted operand to hand, then expanding the result would be trivial. Unfortunately at this stage we can only get hold of the promoted operand. So instead we kind of hand-expand, doing explicit shifting and truncating to get the top and bottom halves of the i64 operand into 2 x i32, which are then used to expand the result. This is harmless, because when the promoted operand is finally expanded all this bit fiddling turns into trivial operations which are eliminated either by the expansion code itself or the DAG combiner. llvm-svn: 43223
-
Evan Cheng authored
- Remove a bogus assertion. llvm-svn: 43211
-
- Oct 21, 2007
-
-
Chris Lattner authored
llvm-svn: 43204
-
- Oct 20, 2007
-
-
Chris Lattner authored
with the new legalizer. llvm-svn: 43199
-
Chris Lattner authored
llvm-svn: 43198
-
Chris Lattner authored
This fixes CodeGen/X86/mem*.ll. llvm-svn: 43197
-
Evan Cheng authored
llvm-svn: 43196
-
Dale Johannesen authored
the operand's type from the right place. llvm-svn: 43195
-
- Oct 19, 2007
-
-
Evan Cheng authored
Turn a store folding instruction into a load folding instruction. e.g. xorl %edi, %eax movl %eax, -32(%ebp) movl -36(%ebp), %eax orl %eax, -32(%ebp) => xorl %edi, %eax orl -36(%ebp), %eax mov %eax, -32(%ebp) This enables the unfolding optimization for a subsequent instruction which will also eliminate the newly introduced store instruction. llvm-svn: 43192
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 43191
-