optimize a call to a llvm intrinsic to something that invovles a call to a C
library call, make sure it sets the right calling convention on the call.

e.g.
extern double pow(double, double);
double t(double x) {
  return pow(10, x);
}

Compiles to something like this for AAPCS-VFP:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
  %0 = call double @llvm.pow.f64(double 1.000000e+01, double %x)
  ret double %0
}

declare double @llvm.pow.f64(double, double) #1

Simplify libcall (part of instcombine) will turn the above into:
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @t(double %x) #0 {
entry:
  %__exp10 = call double @__exp10(double %x) #1
  ret double %__exp10
}

declare double @__exp10(double)

The pre-instcombine code works because calls to LLVM builtins are special.
Instruction selection will chose the right calling convention for the call.
However, the code after instcombine is wrong. The call to __exp10 will use
the C calling convention.

I can think of 3 options to fix this.

1. Make "C" calling convention just work since the target should know what CC
   is being used.

   This doesn't work because each function can use different CC with the "pcs"
   attribute.

2. Have Clang add the right CC keyword on the calls to LLVM builtin.

   This will work but it doesn't match the LLVM IR specification which states
   these are "Standard C Library Intrinsics".

3. Fix simplify libcall so the resulting calls to the C routines will have the
   proper CC keyword. e.g.
   %__exp10 = call arm_aapcs_vfpcc double @__exp10(double %x) #1

   This works and is the solution I implemented here.

Both solutions #2 and #3 would work. After carefully considering the pros and
cons, I decided to implement #3 for the following reasons.

1. It doesn't change the "spec" of the intrinsics.
2. It's a self-contained fix.

There are a couple of potential downsides.
1. There could be other places in the optimizer that is broken in the same way
   that's not addressed by this.
2. There could be other calling conventions that need to be propagated by
   simplify-libcall that's not handled.

But for now, this is the fix that I'm most comfortable with.

llvm-svn: 203488

No change in functionality.

llvm-svn: 203413

llvm-svn: 203366

This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
   detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
   iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
   Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
   they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
   needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
   opaque.

Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.

The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.

However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]

llvm-svn: 203364

Looks like GCC implements the lambda->function pointer conversion differently.

llvm-svn: 203294

No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 203288

Sequences of insertelement/extractelements are sometimes used to build
vectorsr; this code tries to put them back together into shuffles, but
could only produce a completely uniform shuffle types (<N x T> from two
<N x T> sources).

This should allow shuffles with different numbers of elements on the
input and output sides as well.

llvm-svn: 203229

This compiles with no changes to clang/lld/lldb with MSVC and includes
overloads to various functions which are used by those projects and llvm
which have OwningPtr's as parameters. This should allow out of tree
projects some time to move. There are also no changes to libs/Target,
which should help out of tree targets have time to move, if necessary.

llvm-svn: 203083

obviously coupled to the IR.

llvm-svn: 203064

already lives.

llvm-svn: 203046

already lives.

llvm-svn: 203038

Fixes PR19045.

llvm-svn: 203008

already lived there and it is where it belongs -- this is the in-memory
debug location representation.

This is just cleanup -- Modules can actually cope with this, but that
doesn't make it right. After chatting with folks that have out-of-tree
stuff, going ahead and moving the rest of the headers seems preferable.

llvm-svn: 202960

to ensure we don't mess up any of the overrides. Necessary for cleaning
up the Value use iterators and enabling range-based traversing of use
lists.

llvm-svn: 202958

llvm-svn: 202957

llvm-svn: 202953

a bit surprising, as the class is almost entirely abstracted away from
any particular IR, however it encodes the comparsion predicates which
mutate ranges as ICmp predicate codes. This is reasonable as they're
used for both instructions and constants. Thus, it belongs in the IR
library with instructions and constants.

llvm-svn: 202838

hardcoded to use IR BasicBlocks.

llvm-svn: 202835

instructions.

llvm-svn: 202834

this would have been required because of the use of DataLayout, but that
has moved into the IR proper. It is still required because this folder
uses the constant folding in the analysis library (which uses the
datalayout) as the more aggressive basis of its folder.

llvm-svn: 202832

IR types.

llvm-svn: 202827

directly care about the Value class (it is templated so that the key can
be any arbitrary Value subclass), it is in fact concretely tied to the
Value class through the ValueHandle's CallbackVH interface which relies
on the key type being some Value subclass to establish the value handle
chain.

Ironically, the unittest is already in the right library.

llvm-svn: 202824

Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.

This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.

llvm-svn: 202821

obviously is coupled to the IR.

llvm-svn: 202818

abstracting between a CallInst and an InvokeInst, both of which are IR
concepts.

llvm-svn: 202816

name might indicate, it is an iterator over the types in an instruction
in the IR.... You see where this is going.

Another step of modularizing the support library.

llvm-svn: 202815

business.

This header includes Function and BasicBlock and directly uses the
interfaces of both classes. It has to do with the IR, it even has that
in the name. =] Put it in the library it belongs to.

This is one step toward making LLVM's Support library survive a C++
modules bootstrap.

llvm-svn: 202814

llvm-svn: 202811

DWARF discriminators are used to distinguish multiple control flow paths
on the same source location. When this happens, instructions across
basic block boundaries will share the same debug location.

This pass detects this situation and creates a new lexical scope to one
of the two instructions. This lexical scope is a child scope of the
original and contains a new discriminator value. This discriminator is
then picked up from MCObjectStreamer::EmitDwarfLocDirective to be
written on the object file.

This fixes http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18270.

llvm-svn: 202752

No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 202751

It's not needed anymore.

llvm-svn: 202748

remove_if that its predicate is adaptable. We don't actually need this,
we can write a generic adapter for any predicate.

This lets us remove some very wrong std::function usages. We should
never be using std::function for predicates to algorithms. This incurs
an *indirect* call overhead for every evaluation of the predicate, and
makes it very hard to inline through.

llvm-svn: 202742

llvm-svn: 202712

This also switches the users in LLVM to ensure this functionality is tested.

llvm-svn: 202705

operand_values. The first provides a range view over operand Use
objects, and the second provides a range view over the Value*s being
used by those operands.

The naming is "STL-style" rather than "LLVM-style" because we have
historically named iterator methods STL-style, and range methods seem to
have far more in common with their iterator counterparts than with
"normal" APIs. Feel free to bikeshed on this one if you want, I'm happy
to change these around if people feel strongly.

I've switched code in SROA and LCG to exercise these mostly to ensure
they work correctly -- we don't really have an easy way to unittest this
and they're trivial.

llvm-svn: 202687

The old implementation is no longer needed in C++11.

llvm-svn: 202644

Remove the old functions.

llvm-svn: 202636

llvm-svn: 202621

directly, and remove the macro.

llvm-svn: 202612

No intended functionality change.

llvm-svn: 202588