- Apr 16, 2012
-
-
Rafael Espindola authored
so we don't want it to show up in the stable 3.1 interface. While at it, add a comment about why LTOCodeGenerator manually creates the internalize pass. llvm-svn: 154807
-
Chandler Carruth authored
laid out in a form with a fallthrough into the header and a fallthrough out of the bottom. In that case, leave the loop alone because any rotation will introduce unnecessary branches. If either side looks like it will require an explicit branch, then the rotation won't add any, do it to ensure the branch occurs outside of the loop (if possible) and maximize the benefit of the fallthrough in the bottom. llvm-svn: 154806
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
To be used in printing unprintable source in clang diagnostics. Patch by Seth Cantrell, with a minor fix for mingw by me. llvm-svn: 154805
-
Eli Bendersky authored
llvm-svn: 154804
-
Argyrios Kyrtzidis authored
llvm-svn: 154802
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 154801
-
Argyrios Kyrtzidis authored
To be used in printing unprintable source in clang diagnostics. Patch by Seth Cantrell! llvm-svn: 154800
-
Craig Topper authored
Change type profile for vpermv back to using operand type for the mask argument to match intrinsic behavior. Add a bitcast to the lowering code to convert mask from v8i32 to v8f32 for vpermps. llvm-svn: 154798
-
Craig Topper authored
Flip the arguments when converting vpermd/vpermps intrinsics into instructions. The intrinsic has the mask as the last operand, but the instruction has it as the second. llvm-svn: 154797
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 154796
-
Bill Wendling authored
llvm-svn: 154793
-
Sebastian Pop authored
llvm-svn: 154791
-
Hal Finkel authored
llvm-svn: 154788
-
Hal Finkel authored
llvm-svn: 154787
-
Hal Finkel authored
llvm-svn: 154786
-
Chandler Carruth authored
This is a complex change that resulted from a great deal of experimentation with several different benchmarks. The one which proved the most useful is included as a test case, but I don't know that it captures all of the relevant changes, as I didn't have specific regression tests for each, they were more the result of reasoning about what the old algorithm would possibly do wrong. I'm also failing at the moment to craft more targeted regression tests for these changes, if anyone has ideas, it would be welcome. The first big thing broken with the old algorithm is the idea that we can take a basic block which has a loop-exiting successor and a looping successor and use the looping successor as the layout top in order to get that particular block to be the bottom of the loop after layout. This happens to work in many cases, but not in all. The second big thing broken was that we didn't try to select the exit which fell into the nearest enclosing loop (to which we exit at all). As a consequence, even if the rotation worked perfectly, it would result in one of two bad layouts. Either the bottom of the loop would get fallthrough, skipping across a nearer enclosing loop and thereby making it discontiguous, or it would be forced to take an explicit jump over the nearest enclosing loop to earch its successor. The point of the rotation is to get fallthrough, so we need it to fallthrough to the nearest loop it can. The fix to the first issue is to actually layout the loop from the loop header, and then rotate the loop such that the correct exiting edge can be a fallthrough edge. This is actually much easier than I anticipated because we can handle all the hard parts of finding a viable rotation before we do the layout. We just store that, and then rotate after layout is finished. No inner loops get split across the post-rotation backedge because we check for them when selecting the rotation. That fix exposed a latent problem with our exitting block selection -- we should allow the backedge to point into the middle of some inner-loop chain as there is no real penalty to it, the whole point is that it *won't* be a fallthrough edge. This may have blocked the rotation at all in some cases, I have no idea and no test case as I've never seen it in practice, it was just noticed by inspection. Finally, all of these fixes, and studying the loops they produce, highlighted another problem: in rotating loops like this, we sometimes fail to align the destination of these backwards jumping edges. Fix this by actually walking the backwards edges rather than relying on loopinfo. This fixes regressions on heapsort if block placement is enabled as well as lots of other cases where the previous logic would introduce an abundance of unnecessary branches into the execution. llvm-svn: 154783
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 154782
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 154781
-
Craig Topper authored
Spacing fixes and 80 column fixes. Use 0 instead of 0x80 for undef indices in vpermps/vpermd. Hardware only looks at lower 3-bits. llvm-svn: 154780
-
Craig Topper authored
llvm-svn: 154778
-
Craig Topper authored
Make member variables of AsmToken private. Remove unnecessary forward declarations. Remove an unnecessary include. llvm-svn: 154775
-
- Apr 15, 2012
-
-
Jakub Staszak authored
llvm-svn: 154773
-
Nadav Rotem authored
Patch by nobled <nobled@dreamwidth.org> llvm-svn: 154772
-
Jakub Staszak authored
llvm-svn: 154771
-
Nadav Rotem authored
Use non-vex instructions for SSE4. llvm-svn: 154770
-
Duncan Sands authored
llvm-svn: 154766
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
As an example, attach range info to the "invalid instruction" message: $ clang -arch arm -c asm.c asm.c:2:11: error: invalid instruction __asm__("foo r0"); ^ <inline asm>:1:2: note: instantiated into assembly here foo r0 ^~~ llvm-svn: 154765
-
Nadav Rotem authored
llvm-svn: 154764
-
Elena Demikhovsky authored
llvm-svn: 154761
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 154759
-
NAKAMURA Takumi authored
llvm-svn: 154758
-
- Apr 14, 2012
-
-
Anshuman Dasgupta authored
llvm-svn: 154755
-
Anshuman Dasgupta authored
by Sundeep Kushwaha. llvm-svn: 154754
-
Brendon Cahoon authored
llvm-svn: 154752
-
Duncan Sands authored
llvm-svn: 154750
-
Duncan Sands authored
thinking of generalizing it to be able to specify other freedoms beyond accuracy (such as that NaN's don't have to be respected). I'd like the 3.1 release (the first one with this metadata) to have the more generic name already rather than having to auto-upgrade it in 3.2. llvm-svn: 154744
-
Benjamin Kramer authored
Without this gcc doesn't allow us to put a StringMap into a std::map. Works with clang though. llvm-svn: 154737
-
Hal Finkel authored
When vectorizing pointer types it is important to realize that potential pairs cannot be connected via the address pointer argument of a load or store. This is because even after vectorization, the address is still a scalar because the address of the higher half of the pair is implicit from the address of the lower half (it need not be, and should not be, explicitly computed). llvm-svn: 154735
-
Hal Finkel authored
llvm-svn: 154734
-
Andrew Trick authored
This is a special flag for targets that really want their block terminators in the DAG. The default scheduler cannot handle this correctly, so it becomes the specialized scheduler's responsibility to schedule terminators. llvm-svn: 154712
-