and call PrintGlobalVariable, allowing elimination and simplification
of various targets.

llvm-svn: 76604

Add PrefixPrinter arguments to the dump routines for MachineFunction and
MachineBasicBlock.  We'll use these shortly.

llvm-svn: 76603

Add a small utility class to configure IR printers.  This will allow
printers to do neat and wonderful things when printing debug
information.  The ideas is to allow passes to configer printers to emit
pass-specific information when dumping IR.

llvm-svn: 76602

Make a bunch of changes suggested by Chris and others to improve
efficiency.  Fix a few formatting bugs along the way.

llvm-svn: 76601

llvm-svn: 76600

llvm-svn: 76599

llvm-svn: 76598

llvm-svn: 76597

llvm-svn: 76596

llvm-svn: 76595

llvm-svn: 76594

chain to the super class instead of initializing mangler directly.
This gives it .file and module level inline asm support among other
things.

llvm-svn: 76593

This eliminates redundancy setting up the mangler and adds support to them
for module-level inline asm and a .file directive.

llvm-svn: 76592

llvm-svn: 76591

LLVM IR concept.

llvm-svn: 76590

Also, tweak the return type of size().

llvm-svn: 76588

llvm-svn: 76587

llvm-svn: 76586

vectors needlessly, doxygenify comments, improve constness, etc.

llvm-svn: 76585

llvm-svn: 76583

llvm-svn: 76579

as much, etc.

llvm-svn: 76578

llvm-svn: 76577

Zaffanella, with tweaks from Abramo Bagnara.

llvm-svn: 76576

llvm-svn: 76559

Another rewriter bug exposed by recent coalescer changes. ReuseInfo::GetRegForReload() should make sure the "switched" register is in the desired register class. I'm surprised this hasn't caused more failures in the past.

llvm-svn: 76558

llvm-svn: 76555

llvm-svn: 76554

llvm-svn: 76553

llvm-svn: 76547

llvm-svn: 76546

llvm-svn: 76543

llvm-svn: 76542

llvm-svn: 76541

global declared symbols are initialized with references from other global
symbols.

llvm-svn: 76540

llvm-svn: 76539

struct foo {
  static bool value;
};
bool (foo::value); // crash because of parens

llvm-svn: 76538

llvm-svn: 76537

llvm-svn: 76536

Is this really a winning transformation?
fold (shl (srl x, c1), c2) -> (shl (and x, (shl -1, c1)), (sub c2, c1)) or                                                                              
                              (srl (and x, (shl -1, c1)), (sub c1, c2))

llvm-svn: 76535